The impact of electricity market liberalization in Turkey "Free consumer" and distributional monopoly cases

被引:12
作者
Bahce, Serdal [2 ]
Taymaz, Erol [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Econ, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-06590 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
electricity markets; liberalization; regulation; distributional monopoly; free consumer;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electricity sector has grown substantially in Turkey since the early 1960s as a result of rapid industrialization and urbanization. The vertically integrated state-owned company had a legally established monopoly on the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Turkey. With the support and encouragement of international organizations like the World Bank, Turkey has initiated a comprehensive program to liberalize and privatize the electricity market in 2001. The liberalization of the electricity market in Turkey started in the distribution side of the market. The distribution network was divided into 21 distribution regions and in each of these, separate - initially state-owned - disbibution companies have been authorized to distribute and sell electricity. The plan envisaged to complete privatization of all distribution companies until the end of 2006. This study compares the welfare implication of privatization of the distribution networks by comparing two extreme cases, a pure regional distributional monopoly case and a representative pure "free" consumer case, with a benchmark case of administered price regulation. For this purpose, we develop a simulation model of the Turkish electricity system, and use the data on generation and distribution costs. Our simulation analysis shows that substantial welfare losses occur if the distributional companies behave as regional monopolists. Our findings reiterate the importance of regulation and market design. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1603 / 1624
页数:22
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The productivity and efficiency of the Australian electricity supply industry [J].
Abbott, Malcolm .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (04) :444-454
[2]   Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey [J].
Altinay, G ;
Karagol, E .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (06) :849-856
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, UK EXPERIENCE PRIVAT
[4]   Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience [J].
Bagdadioglu, N ;
Price, CMW ;
WeymanJones, TG .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (1-2) :1-23
[5]   Risk and promise in energy market liberalization: consumer choice in buying electricity [J].
Barton, B .
APPLIED ENERGY, 1999, 64 (1-4) :275-288
[6]   Governance of electricity transmission systems [J].
Boyce, JR ;
Hollis, A .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (02) :237-255
[7]  
BRUNEKREEFT G, 1998, REGULATION ELECT DIS
[8]  
*COMM EUR COMM, 2005, 863 COM COMM EUR COM
[9]   Transmission loss allocation: A comparison of different practical algorithms [J].
Conejo, AJ ;
Arroyo, JM ;
Alguacil, N ;
Guijarro, AL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (03) :571-576
[10]   Z-bus loss allocation [J].
Conejo, AJ ;
Galiana, FD ;
Kockar, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (01) :105-110