Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

被引：55

作者：

van der Sluis, Pieter Christiaan ^{[1
]}

Schizas, Dimitrios ^{[2
]}

Liakakos, Theodore ^{[2
]}

van Hillegersberg, Richard ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, G04-228,Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands

[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Surg 1, Laikon Gen Hosp, Athens, Greece

来源：

DIGESTIVE SURGERY | 2020年 / 37卷 / 02期

关键词：

Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy; Esophageal cancer; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; PRONE POSITION; CANCER; OUTCOMES; ROBOT; EXPERIENCE; ESOPHAGUS; RESECTION;

D O I：

10.1159/000497456

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was introduced in the 1990s with the aim to decrease the rate of respiratory complications associated with thoracotomy, along with the benefits of reduced morbidity and a quicker return to normal activities provided by minimally invasive techniques. However, MIE is not routinely applied as a standard approach for esophageal cancer worldwide, due to the high technical complexity of this minimally invasive procedure. Therefore, the open transthoracic esophagectomy is considered to be the gold standard for resectable esophageal cancer worldwide nowadays. In this article, the current status of conventional MIE and robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be reviewed.

引用

页码：93 / 100

页数：8

共 40 条

[1]

Biere SSAY, 2009, MINERVA CHIR, V64, P121

[2] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].

Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;

Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;

Maas, Kirsten W. ;

Bonavina, Luigi ;

Rosman, Camiel ;

Roig Garcia, Josep ;

Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;

Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;

Hollmann, Markus W. ;

de lange, Elly S. M. ;

Bonjer, H. Jaap ;

van der Peet, Donald L. ;

Cuesta, Miguel A. .

LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892

[3] Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial) [J].

Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;

Maas, Kirsten W. ;

Bonavina, Luigi ;

Roig Garcia, Josep ;

Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;

Rosman, Camiel ;

Sosef, Meindert N. ;

de lange, Elly S. M. ;

Bonjer, H. Jaap ;

Cuesta, Miguel A. ;

van der Peet, Donald L. .

BMC SURGERY, 2011, 11

[4] Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer [J].

Boone, J. ;

Schipper, M. E. I. ;

Moojen, W. A. ;

Rinkes, I. H. M. Borel ;

Cromheecke, G. J. E. ;

van Hillegersberg, R. .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (08) :878-886

[5] A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy [J].

Burdall, Oliver C. ;

Boddy, Alexander P. ;

Fullick, James ;

Blazeby, Jane ;

Krysztopik, Richard ;

Streets, Christopher ;

Hollowood, Andrew ;

Barham, Christopher P. ;

Titcomb, Dan .

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (02) :431-437

[6] EN-BLOC AND STANDARD ESOPHAGECTOMIES BY THORACOSCOPY [J].

COLLARD, JM ;

LENGELE, B ;

OTTE, JB ;

KESTENS, PJ .

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1993, 56 (03) :675-679

[7]

Cuschieri A, 1992, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V37, P7

[8] Evidence to Support the Use of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer A Meta-analysis [J].

Dantoc, Marc ;

Cox, Michael R. ;

Eslick, Guy D. .

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (08) :768-776

[9] Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review [J].

Dantoc, Marc M. ;

Cox, Michael R. ;

Eslick, Guy D. .

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (03) :486-494

[10]

DEPAULA AL, 1995, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V5, P1

← 1 2 3 4 →