The time course of motor cortex plasticity after spaced motor practice

被引:10
作者
Delvendahl, Igor [1 ]
Kuhnke, Nicola G. [1 ]
Jung, Nikolai H. [1 ]
Mainberger, Florian [1 ]
Cronjaeger, Matthias [1 ]
Unterrainer, Josef [2 ]
Hauschke, Dieter [3 ]
Mall, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Div Neuropaediat & Muscular Disorders, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol Biol & Differential Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Med Biometry & Med Informat, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor system; learning; long-term potentiation; cortical plasticity; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; PRACTICE-DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; MEMORY; MODULATION; CONSOLIDATION; EXCITABILITY; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2010.10.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Motor learning takes place in several phases. Animal experiments suggest that synaptic plasticity plays an important role in acquisition of motor skills, whereas retention of motor performance is most likely achieved by other mechanisms. Objective/hypothesis This study compared two spacing approaches and investigated the time course of synaptic plasticity after spaced motor practice (MP). Methods Twenty subjects performed a ballistic thumb flexion task in sessions of 6 x 10 minutes or 12 x 5 minutes. We measured peak acceleration of the target movement throughout the experiment and cortical excitability more than 60 minutes after MP via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). After a retention period, both parameters were re-evaluated. Results Mean peak acceleration of the target movement significantly increased (6 x 10 minutes: 21.61 m/s(2) versus 30.80 m/s(2), P = .002; 12 x 5 minutes: 18.52 in/s(2) versus 29.65 m/s(2), P = .01). In both training groups, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of the trained muscle continuously increased after MP (6 x 10 min: 0.93 mV versus 1.57 mV, P = .19; 12 x 5 min: 0.90 mV versus 1.76 mV, P = .004). After the retention period, motor performance was still significantly enhanced, whereas MEP amplitudes were no longer significantly increased. Conclusions These findings do not provide evidence that in small scale motor learning the duration of practice and rest influences behavioral improvement or induction of cortical plasticity. Our study demonstrates that cortical plasticity after MP displays a dynamical time course that might be caused by different mechanisms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex
    Ziemann, U
    Iliac, TV
    Pauli, C
    Meintzschel, F
    Ruge, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (07) : 1666 - 1672
  • [42] Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex
    Ziemann, U
    Muellbacher, W
    Hallett, M
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. BRAIN, 2001, 124 : 1171 - 1181
  • [43] Ziemann Ulf, 2006, Suppl Clin Neurophysiol, V59, P19
  • [44] Ziemann Ulf, 2004, Suppl Clin Neurophysiol, V57, P702