The time course of motor cortex plasticity after spaced motor practice

被引:10
作者
Delvendahl, Igor [1 ]
Kuhnke, Nicola G. [1 ]
Jung, Nikolai H. [1 ]
Mainberger, Florian [1 ]
Cronjaeger, Matthias [1 ]
Unterrainer, Josef [2 ]
Hauschke, Dieter [3 ]
Mall, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Div Neuropaediat & Muscular Disorders, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol Biol & Differential Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Med Biometry & Med Informat, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor system; learning; long-term potentiation; cortical plasticity; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; PRACTICE-DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; LONG-TERM POTENTIATION; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; MEMORY; MODULATION; CONSOLIDATION; EXCITABILITY; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2010.10.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Motor learning takes place in several phases. Animal experiments suggest that synaptic plasticity plays an important role in acquisition of motor skills, whereas retention of motor performance is most likely achieved by other mechanisms. Objective/hypothesis This study compared two spacing approaches and investigated the time course of synaptic plasticity after spaced motor practice (MP). Methods Twenty subjects performed a ballistic thumb flexion task in sessions of 6 x 10 minutes or 12 x 5 minutes. We measured peak acceleration of the target movement throughout the experiment and cortical excitability more than 60 minutes after MP via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). After a retention period, both parameters were re-evaluated. Results Mean peak acceleration of the target movement significantly increased (6 x 10 minutes: 21.61 m/s(2) versus 30.80 m/s(2), P = .002; 12 x 5 minutes: 18.52 in/s(2) versus 29.65 m/s(2), P = .01). In both training groups, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of the trained muscle continuously increased after MP (6 x 10 min: 0.93 mV versus 1.57 mV, P = .19; 12 x 5 min: 0.90 mV versus 1.76 mV, P = .004). After the retention period, motor performance was still significantly enhanced, whereas MEP amplitudes were no longer significantly increased. Conclusions These findings do not provide evidence that in small scale motor learning the duration of practice and rest influences behavioral improvement or induction of cortical plasticity. Our study demonstrates that cortical plasticity after MP displays a dynamical time course that might be caused by different mechanisms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] The effects of practice and delay on motor skill learning and retention
    Savion-Lemieux, T
    Penhune, VB
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 161 (04) : 423 - 431
  • [32] Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation
    Shadmehr, R
    Holcomb, HH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5327) : 821 - 825
  • [33] Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills
    Shea, CH
    Lai, Q
    Black, C
    Park, JH
    [J]. HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 19 (05) : 737 - 760
  • [34] Practice Makes Imperfect: Restorative Effects of Sleep on Motor Learning
    Sheth, Bhavin R.
    Janvelyan, Davit
    Khan, Murtuza
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (09):
  • [35] Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation
    Stefan, K
    Kunesch, E
    Benecke, R
    Cohen, LG
    Classen, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2002, 543 (02): : 699 - 708
  • [36] Temporary occlusion of associative motor cortical plasticity by prior dynamic motor training
    Stefan, K
    Wycislo, M
    Gentner, R
    Schramm, A
    Naumann, M
    Reiners, K
    Classen, J
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2006, 16 (03) : 376 - 385
  • [37] Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation
    Stefan, K
    Kunesch, E
    Cohen, LG
    Benecke, R
    Classen, J
    [J]. BRAIN, 2000, 123 : 572 - 584
  • [38] Practice with sleep makes perfect: Sleep-dependent motor skill learning
    Walker, MP
    Brakefield, T
    Morgan, A
    Hobson, JA
    Stickgold, R
    [J]. NEURON, 2002, 35 (01) : 205 - 211
  • [39] Deafferentation of neighbouring motor cortex areas does not further enhance saturated practice-dependent plasticity in healthy adults
    Walther, Michael
    Kuhnke, Nicola
    Schessl, Joachim
    Delvendahl, Igor
    Jung, Nikolai
    Kreml, Dirk
    Ziemann, Ulf
    Mall, Volker
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (04) : 886 - 891
  • [40] Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories
    Xu, Tonghui
    Yu, Xinzhu
    Perlik, Andrew J.
    Tobin, Willie F.
    Zweig, Jonathan A.
    Tennant, Kelly
    Jones, Theresa
    Zuo, Yi
    [J]. NATURE, 2009, 462 (7275) : 915 - U108