Incorporating biologic measurements (SF2, CFE) into a tumor control probability model increases their prognostic significance:: A study in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy

被引:42
作者
Buffa, FM
Davidson, SE
Hunter, RD
Nahum, AE
West, CML
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Dept Phys, London SW3 6JB, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England
[3] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Paterson Inst Canc Res, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[4] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Paterson Inst Canc Res, CRC, Expt Radiat Oncol Grp, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2001年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
radiobiologic models; radiosensitivity; SF2; predictive assays; tumor control probability;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01584-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess whether incorporation of measurements of surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) and colony-forming efficiency (CFE) into a tumor control probability (tcp) model increases their prognostic significance. Methods and Materials: Measurements of SF2 and CFE were available from a study on carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation alone. These measurements, as well as tumor volume, dose, and treatment time, were incorporated into a Poisson tcp model (tcp(alpha,rho)). Regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic power of tcp(alpha,rho) vs. the use of either tcp models with biologic parameters fixed to best-fit estimates (but incorporating individual dose, volume, and treatment time) or the use of SF2 and CFE measurements alone. Results: In a univariate regression analysis of 44 patients, tcp(alpha,rho) was a better prognostic factor for both local control-and survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively) than SF2 alone (p = 0.009 for local control, p = 0.29 for survival) or CFE alone (p = 0.015 for local control, p = 0.38 for survival). In multivariate analysis, tcp(alpha,rho) emerged as the most important prognostic factor for local control (p < 0.001, relative risk of 2.81). After allowing for tcp(alpha,rho), CFE was still a significant independent prognostic factor for local control, whereas SF2 was not. The sensitivities of tcp(alpha,rho) and SF2 as predictive tests for local control were 87% and 65%, respectively. Specificities were 70% and 77%, respectively. Conclusions: A Poisson tcp model incorporating individual SF2, CFE, dose, tumor volume, and treatment time was found to be the best independent prognostic factor for local control and survival in cervical carcinoma patients. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1122
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Tumor radiosensitivity (SF2) is a prognostic factor for local control in head and neck cancers
    Björk-Eriksson, T
    West, C
    Karlsson, E
    Mercke, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01): : 13 - 19
  • [2] Prediction of radiotherapy response of cervical carcinoma through measurement of proliferation rate
    Bolger, BS
    Symonds, RP
    Stanton, PD
    Maclean, AB
    Burnett, R
    Kelly, P
    Cooke, TG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (08) : 1223 - 1226
  • [3] A CONVENIENT EXTENSION OF THE LINEAR-QUADRATIC MODEL TO INCLUDE REDISTRIBUTION AND REOXYGENATION
    BRENNER, DJ
    HLATKY, LR
    HAHNFELDT, PJ
    HALL, EJ
    SACHS, RK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (02): : 379 - 390
  • [4] DOSE, VOLUME, AND TUMOR-CONTROL PREDICTIONS IN RADIOTHERAPY
    BRENNER, DJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (01): : 171 - 179
  • [5] An analysis of the relationship between radiosensitivity and volume effects in tumor control probability modeling
    Buffa, FM
    Fenwick, JD
    Nahum, AE
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) : 1258 - 1265
  • [6] Dudewicz E., 1988, MODERN MATH STAT
  • [7] Predictive assays of radiation response in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the Institute Gustave Roussy experience
    Eschwege, F
    Bourhis, J
    Girinski, T
    Lartigau, E
    Guichard, M
    Deble, D
    Kepta, L
    Wilson, GD
    Luboinski, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04): : 849 - 853
  • [8] Predicting the radiation control probability of heterogeneous tumour ensembles: data analysis and parameter estimation using a closed-form expression
    Fenwick, JD
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (08) : 2159 - 2178
  • [9] Hockel M, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P4509
  • [10] Intratumoral pO2-measurements as predictive assay in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix
    Knocke, TH
    Weitmann, HD
    Feldmann, HJ
    Selzer, E
    Pötter, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 53 (02) : 99 - 104