Assessing consumers' adoption of active and intelligent packaging

被引:48
作者
Aday, Mehmet Seckin [1 ]
Yener, Ugur [1 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Dept Food Engn, Canakkale, Turkey
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2015年 / 117卷 / 01期
关键词
Consumer behaviour; Active packaging; Intelligent packaging; Purchasing decision; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; HEALTH CLAIMS; FOOD; TECHNOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; DEMANDS; IMPACT; FILMS;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-07-2013-0191
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify the purchase behavior with regard to innovative food packaging techniques and sociodemographic properties of consumers in Turkey (the crossroads of Europe and Asia). Design/methodology/approach - The survey was conducted with 365 people (around 50 persons for each region) who live in the different regions to represent the whole population of Turkey as good as possible. Questionnaire methodology was used to achieve the research objectives. Multiple-choice test which consists of 24 questions (Table I) were selected in order to keep the questionnaire at a reasonable length. Questionnaires were distributed to the respondents in small groups for effective communication. Multiple correspondence, decision tree and prospect profiles statistic procedures were used to identify the purchase behavior. Findings - In the study, some consumers worried that innovative packages might mislead them and therefore sales should be handled under trusted brands. Majority of consumers were willing to use innovative food packages to prevent the microbial spoilage. Consumers indicated that they do not want to see sachets in active food packages due to the probability of mistaken. Consumers who chose the price as a first thing to get their attention in food packaging, would accept the increase in price lesser than 10 percent after seeing the positive impacts of innovative packaging. Most of the consumers' (74.79 percent) expectation from innovative packaging was the visual ability to observe the history and freshness of foods inside the packaging. Participants indicated that education through commercials (40.55 percent) would be the most effective way in order to increase the overall acceptability for innovative packaging. Research limitations/implications - The limitation of this study was that, these questionnaires were applied only to Turkish consumers and findings might not be applicable to other countries. Practical implications - Better understanding of consumer adoption of innovative packages can help to minimize rejection of innovative technologies. Knowledge of consumer behaviors toward active and intelligent packaging can contribute to developing better industry strategies. Originality/value - This paper gives the detailed information about purchasing behavior of Turkish consumers' regarding innovative packaging techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 177
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Ahvenainen R, 1997, FOOD ADDIT CONTAM, V14, P753
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, PACKAG TECHNOL SCI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ACTIVE INTELLIGENT P, V4, P5
  • [4] Engineering Properties of Polymeric-Based Antimicrobial Films for Food Packaging
    Bastarrachea, Luis
    Dhawan, Sumeet
    Sablani, Shyam S.
    [J]. FOOD ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2011, 3 (02) : 79 - 93
  • [5] Brazilian consumer views on food irradiation
    Behrens, Jorge H.
    Barcellos, Maria N.
    Frewer, Lynn J.
    Nunes, Tatiana P.
    Landgraf, Mariza
    [J]. INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 10 (03) : 383 - 389
  • [6] RISK COMMUNICATION, KNOWLEDGE, AND ATTITUDES - EXPLAINING REACTIONS TO A TECHNOLOGY PERCEIVED AS RISKY
    BORD, RJ
    OCONNOR, RE
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1990, 10 (04) : 499 - 506
  • [7] Oxygen scavenging polyolefin nanocomposite films containing an iron modified kaolinite of interest in active food packaging applications
    Busolo, Maria A.
    Lagaron, Jose M.
    [J]. INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 16 : 211 - 217
  • [8] Measuring consumer resistance to a new food technology: A choice experiment in meat packaging
    Chen, Qing
    Anders, Sven
    An, Henry
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2013, 28 (02) : 419 - 428
  • [9] Cui G, 2009, J CONSUM MARK, V26, P110, DOI 10.1108/07363760910940474
  • [10] Dainelli D., 2008, Trends in Food Sci. Tech, V19, pS103, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.011, DOI 10.1016/J.TIFS.2008.09.011]