Examining five-and ten-year survival in older women with breast cancer using cancer-specific geriatric assessment

被引:64
作者
Clough-Gorr, Kerri M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thwin, Soe Soe [1 ,4 ]
Stuck, Andreas E. [5 ,6 ]
Silliman, Rebecca A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Geriatr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Univ Bern, ISPM, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, NICER, ISPM, CH-3006 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] VA Healthcare Syst, Massachusetts Vet Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr MA, Boston, MA 02130 USA
[5] Inselspital Univ Hosp, Div Geriatr, Dept Gen Internal Med, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Assessment; Breast cancer; Cancer-specific geriatric assessment; Decision-making; Guideline-recommended therapy; Geriatric assessment; Older women; Survival; Survivor; PHYSICIANS REASONS; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PATIENT; AGE; METAANALYSIS; FRAMEWORK; PATTERNS; ONCOLOGY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine five-and ten-year survival based on cancer-specific geriatric assessment (C-SGA) in older women with early stage breast cancer. Methods: We evaluated 660 women >= 65-years old diagnosed with stage I-IIIA primary breast cancer and attending physician permission to contact in four geographic regions in the United States of America (USA). Data were collected over ten-years of follow-up from consenting women's medical records, telephone interviews, National Death Index and Social Security Death Index. C-SGA was described by four domains using six measures: socio-demographic (financial resources); clinical (comorbidity, obesity); function (physical function limitations); and psychosocial (general mental health, social support). Survival from all-cause and breast-cancer-specific mortality and receipt of guideline-recommended therapy was assessed for different groups of subjects with C-SGA domain deficits (cut-off >= 3 deficits). Results: The proportion of women with >= 3 C-SGA deficits surviving ten-years was consistently statistically significantly lower (all-cause 26% versus 46% and breast-cancer-specific 76% versus 89%, p <= 0.04). The proportion significantly decreased as number of C-SGA deficits increased (linear trend p < 0.0001). Receipt of guideline-recommended therapy decreased with age but not consistently by number of C-SGA deficits. The all-cause and breast-cancer-specific death rate at five-and ten-years was consistently approximately two times higher in women with >= 3 C-SGA deficits even when fully adjusted for confounding factors (HR5-yrAllCauseFullyAdjusted = 1.87 [1.36-2.57], HR10(-yrAllCauseFullyAdjusted) = 1.74 [1.35-2.15], HR5-(yrBreastCancerFullyAdjusted) = 1.95 [1.18-3.20], HR10-(yrBreastCancerFullyAdjusted) = 1.99 [1.21-3.28]). Conclusion: Regardless of age and stage of disease, C-SGA predicts five-and ten-year all-cause and breast-cancer-specific survival in older women. Hence, C-SGA may provide an effective strategy to guide treatment decision-making and to identify risk factors for intervention. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 812
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   ASSESSING ILLNESS SEVERITY - DOES CLINICAL JUDGMENT WORK [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
SAX, FL ;
MACKENZIE, CR ;
FIELDS, SD ;
BRAHAM, RL ;
DOUGLAS, RG .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (06) :439-452
[12]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[13]   Utilization of comprehensive geriatric assessment in cancer patients [J].
Chen, CCH ;
Kenefick, AL ;
Tang, ST ;
McCorkle, R .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2004, 49 (01) :53-67
[14]  
Clough-Gorr KM, 2008, ONCOLOGY-NY, V22, P925
[15]  
Clough-Gorr KM, J CLIN ONCOL, V28, P380
[16]   Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer [J].
Extermann, Martine ;
Hurria, Arti .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (14) :1824-1831
[17]   Meeting highlights:: Updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer [J].
Goldhirsch, A ;
Wood, WC ;
Gelber, RD ;
Coates, AS ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Senn, HJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) :3357-3365
[18]  
Greenland S, 1998, Modern epidemiology, V2, P401
[19]   Factors influencing treatment patterns of breast cancer patients age 75 and older [J].
Hurria, A ;
Leung, D ;
Trainor, K ;
Borgen, P ;
Norton, L ;
Hudis, C .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 46 (02) :121-126
[20]   Identifying vulnerable older adults with cancer: Integrating geriatric assessment into oncology practice [J].
Hurria, Arti ;
Lichtman, Stuart M. ;
Gardes, Jonathan ;
Li, Daneng ;
Limaye, Sewanti ;
Patil, Sujata ;
Zuckerman, Enid ;
Tew, William ;
Hamlin, Paul ;
Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K. ;
Lachs, Mark ;
Kelly, Eva .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (10) :1604-1608