Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial

被引:31
作者
Garborg, K. K. [1 ,2 ]
Loberg, M. [2 ,6 ]
Matre, J. [1 ]
Holme, O. [1 ,2 ]
Kalager, M. [4 ,5 ]
Hoff, G. [3 ,5 ]
Bretthauer, M. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sorlandet Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, NordICC Study Ctr, Kristiansand, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Telemark Hosp, Skien, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Oslo, Norway
关键词
WIDE-ANGLE; HIGH-DEFINITION; STANDARD; ENDOSCOPY; INSERTION; EUROPE; RISK;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1309755
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended in several countries, but uptake rates are often low. Fear of pain and also time-consuming costly sedation are barriers for colonoscopy, and thus development of colonoscopy equipment that decreases patient discomfort is worthwhile. This randomized controlled trial investigated the performance of an ultrathin colonoscope in CRC screening. Patients and methods: Consecutive participants in a colonoscopy screening trial were randomized to examination with an ultrathin prototype colonoscope or a standard colonoscope. The main outcome measure was pain during the examination. Participants rated pain (no, slight, moderate, severe) using a validated questionnaire. Results: From 187 enrolled participants (80 women [43%]), 162 (87%) responded to the questionnaire. The study groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics. Pain scores were significantly lower in the prototype instrument group compared with the standard group (78% vs. 29% of patients with no pain in prototype and standard groups, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.23; P<0.001). Cecal intubation rate was 98% in the prototype group and 92% in the standard group (P=0.085). Sedation was used in 2% and 7% in the prototype and standard groups respectively (P=0.12). Adenoma detection rate was 13% in the prototype group vs. 24% in the standard group (P=0.052). Conclusion: The new ultrathin Olympus colonoscope decreases patient pain during screening colonoscopy. This feature may improve uptake and patient satisfaction in screening colonoscopy. Further study is needed to evaluate the lower adenoma detection rate.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 745
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, SAMPLE SIZE TABLES C
  • [2] ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR BINARY, ORDERED CATEGORICAL, AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN 2 GROUP COMPARISONS
    CAMPBELL, MJ
    JULIOUS, SA
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7013) : 1145 - 1148
  • [3] 170° wide-angle colonoscope:: Effect on efficiency and miss rates
    Deenadayalu, VP
    Chadalawada, V
    Rex, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (11) : 2138 - 2142
  • [4] Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy
    Denberg, TD
    Melhado, TV
    Coombes, JM
    Beaty, BL
    Berman, K
    Byers, TE
    Marcus, AC
    Steiner, JF
    Ahnen, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (11) : 989 - 995
  • [5] Factors associated with abdominal discomfort during colonoscopy: a prospective analysis
    Elphick, David A.
    Donnelly, Mark T.
    Smith, Karen S.
    Riley, Stuart A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 21 (09) : 1076 - 1082
  • [6] Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: A randomized controlled trial
    Fatima, Hala
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Rothstein, Richard
    Rahmani, Emad
    Nehme, Omar
    Dewitt, John
    Helper, Debra
    Toor, Arifa
    Bensen, Steven
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [7] The Norwegian Gastronet project: Continuous quality improvement of colonoscopy in 14 Norwegian centres
    Hoff, G
    Bretthauer, M
    Huppertz-Hauss, G
    Kittang, E
    Stallemo, A
    Hoie, O
    Dahler, S
    Nyhus, S
    Halvorsen, FA
    Pallenschat, J
    Vetvik, K
    Sandvei, PK
    Friestad, J
    Pytte, R
    Coll, P
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 41 (04) : 481 - 487
  • [8] Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study
    Hoff, Geir
    Moritz, Volker
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Ludolph, Thomas
    Huppertz-Hauss, Gert
    Paulsen, Jorn
    Seip, Birgitte
    Sauar, Jostein
    Kjellevold, Oystein
    Chengarov, Lubomir
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 46 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [9] Patient time requirements for screening colonoscopy
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Russell, Louise B.
    Sandler, Robert S.
    Chou, Jon
    Pignone, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (11) : 2401 - 2410
  • [10] Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    Kraszewska, Ewa
    Polkowski, Marcin
    Wojciechowska, Urszula
    Didkowska, Joanna
    Zwierko, Maria
    Rupinski, Maciej
    Nowacki, Marek P.
    Butruk, Eugeniusz
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (19) : 1795 - 1803