Dorsal penile nerve block for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy catheter related pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:12
|
作者
Weinberg, Aaron C. [1 ]
Woldu, Solomon L. [1 ]
Bergman, Ari [1 ]
RoyChoudhury, Arindam [2 ]
Patel, Trushar [1 ]
Berg, William [1 ]
Wambi, Christel [1 ]
Badani, Ketan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
SPRINGERPLUS | 2014年 / 3卷
关键词
Postoperative pain; Prostate neoplasm; Analgesia; Prostatectomy; Urinary catheterization; BLADDER DISCOMFORT; OXYBUTYNIN; ANALGESIA; KETOROLAC; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1186/2193-1801-3-181
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) patients routinely have penile pain and urethral discomfort secondary to an indwelling urethral catheter. Our objective was to assess the effect of dorsal penile nerve block with bupivacaine on urethral catheter-related pain after RARP. Methods: From 2012-2013, 140 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer were enrolled in an IRB approved double-blinded, randomized control trial comparing a dorsal penile nerve block of bupivacaine versus placebo after RARP performed by a single-surgeon. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires using the Wong-Bakers FACES Pain Rating scale while hospitalized and for 9 days post-operatively, until the catheter was removed. The primary end-points were: catheter-related discomfort, abdominal (incisional) pain, and bladder spasm-related discomfort. Secondary end-points included narcotic and other analgesic usage. Results: 120 patients were randomized to placebo vs. bupivacaine dorsal penile nerve bock. The two arms (n = 56 bupivacaine and n = 60 placebo) did not differ in preoperative, perioperative, or pathological results. There was no difference in narcotic utilization between the two cohorts. Abdominal pain was slightly lower in the bupivacaine arm at 6 hours compared to the placebo arm, but there was no difference in abdominal pain at other time points, and there were no differences in reported catheter-related discomfort or bladder spasm-associated discomfort at any of the measured time points. Conclusions: The data does not support the routine use of a dorsal penile nerve block with bupivacaine following RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dorsal penile nerve block alleviates pain in men undergoing rigid cystoscopy: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial
    Qiu, Yan
    Liu, Xinhao
    Wei, Wuran
    Du, Guizhi
    BJUI COMPASS, 2021, 2 (04): : 260 - 266
  • [2] Intraoperative acupuncture for posttonsillectomy pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Tsao, Gabriel J.
    Messner, Anna H.
    Seybold, Jeannie
    Sayyid, Zahra N.
    Cheng, Alan G.
    Golianu, Brenda
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (08) : 1972 - 1978
  • [3] THE USE OF KETAMINE FOR ACUTE TREATMENT OF PAIN: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Tatunchak, Tamara
    Paryavi, Mohammad
    Olivo, Maria
    Mian, Usman
    Ruiz, Josel
    Shah, Bupendra
    de Souza, Sylvie
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05) : 601 - 608
  • [4] Preemptive Analgesic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Eidy, Mohammad
    Fazel, Mohammad Reza
    Janzamini, Monir
    Rezaei, Mostafa Haji
    Moravveji, Ali Reza
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (04)
  • [5] Impact of Combination of Local Anesthetic Wounds Infiltration and Ultrasound Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Perioperative Results of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cacciamani, Giovanni Enrico
    Menestrina, Nicola
    Pirozzi, Marco
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Corsi, Paolo
    De Marchi, Davide
    Inverardi, Davide
    Processali, Tania
    Trabacchin, Nicolo'
    De Michele, Mario
    Sebben, Marco
    Cerruto, Maria Angela
    De Marco, Vincenzo
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Porcaro, Antonio Benito
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 295 - 301
  • [6] Effect of Ketorolac on the Prevention of Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Park, Jun-Young
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Yu, Jihion
    Kim, Doo-Hwan
    Koh, Gi-Ho
    Lee, Sang-A
    Hwang, Jai-Hyun
    Kong, Yu-Gyeong
    Kim, Young-Kug
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (06)
  • [7] Pretreatment with Pectoral Nerve Block II Is Effective for Reducing Pain in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Luo, Ge
    Zhu, Jianjun
    Ni, Huadong
    Zhou, Qinghe
    Lu, Yaping
    Shen, Qihong
    Yao, Yibing
    He, Qiuli
    Fu, Jie
    Yao, Ming
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [8] Reduced Opioid Consumption with Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Chung, Chan Jong
    Eom, Deuk Won
    Lee, Tae Young
    Park, Sang Yoong
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 2022
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Udenafil Once Daily in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction after Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    Kwon, Tae Gyun
    Kwak, Cheol
    Sung, Gyung Tak
    Kim, Soo Dong
    Cho, Jin Seon
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2023, 41 (03) : 612 - 622
  • [10] Three-in-One Nerve Block With Different Concentrations of Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
    Xie, Zheng
    Hussain, Waqas
    Cutter, Thomas W.
    Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L.
    Drum, Melinda L.
    Manning, David W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (05) : 673 - 678