Preventing suicide in prisons, part II - International comparisons of suicide prevention services in correctional facilities

被引:35
作者
Daigle, Marc S. [1 ,2 ]
Daniel, Anasseril E. [3 ]
Dear, Greg E. [4 ]
Frottier, Patrick [5 ]
Hayes, Lindsay M. [6 ]
Kerkhof, Ad [7 ]
Konrad, Norbert [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Liebling, Alison [11 ]
Sarchiapone, Marco
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Philippe Pinel Inst Montreal, CRISE, Trois Rivieres, PQ G9A 5H7, Canada
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Joondalup, Australia
[4] JA Mittersteig, Vienna, Austria
[5] Natl Ctr Inst & Alternat, Mansfield, PA USA
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Inst Forens Psychiat Charite, Berlin, Germany
[8] Cambridge Inst Criminol, Cambridge, England
[9] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[10] Univ Molise, Campobasso, Italy
[11] World Psychiat Assoc, Suicidol Sect, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
prison; suicide; prevention; inmate; suicide attempt;
D O I
10.1027/0227-5910.28.3.122
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The International Association for Suicide Prevention created a Task Force on Suicide in Prisons to better disseminate the information in this domain. One of its objectives was to summarize suicide-prevention activities in the prison systems. This study of the Task Force uncovered many differences between countries, although mental health professionals remain central in all suicide prevention activities. Inmate peer-support and correctional officers also play critical roles in suicide prevention but there is great variation in the involvement of outside community workers. These differences could be explained by the availability of resources, by the structure of the correctional and community services, but mainly by the different paradigms about suicide prevention. While there is a common and traditional paradigm that suicide prevention services are mainly offered to individuals by mental health services, correctional systems differ in the way they include (or not) other partners of suicide prevention: correctional officers, other employees, peer inmates, chaplains/priests, and community workers. Circumstances, history, and national cultures may explain such diversity but they might also depend on the basic way we think about suicide prevention at both individual and environmental levels.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Adams K., 1992, CRIME JUSTICE, V16, P275, DOI DOI 10.1086/449208
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PREVENTING SUICIDE O
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PREVENTING SUICIDE O
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WORLD PRISON POPULAT
[5]  
BENNETT LA, 1988, CURRENT VIEWS INMATE
[6]   Demographic, criminal, and psychiatric factors related to inmate suicide [J].
Blaauw, E ;
Kerkhof, JFM ;
Hayes, LM .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2005, 35 (01) :63-75
[7]  
Blaauw E., 2001, Br. J. Forensic Pract, V3, P22, DOI [10.1108/14636646200100024, DOI 10.1108/14636646200100024]
[8]  
Blaauw E., 1999, SUICIDES DETENTIE
[9]  
DAIGLE MS, 1998, EVALUATION VIVA
[10]   Non-fatal self-harm in western Australian prisons: Who, where, when and why [J].
Dear, GE ;
Thomson, DM ;
Hall, GJ ;
Howells, K .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2001, 34 (01) :47-66