Environmental and Economic Assessment of Pre-training Electrolytic Aluminum Production -A case study of China

被引:0
|
作者
Hong, Jingmin [1 ]
Ismail, Zainab Z. [2 ]
Hong, Jinglan [3 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Univ Petr & Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, 1 W Dandong Rd, Fushun 113001, Liaoning Prov, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Baghdad, Dept Environm Engn, Baghdad, Iraq
[3] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China
来源
ADVANCES IN SUPERALLOYS, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2011年 / 146-147卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; electrolytic aluminum system; energy; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.146-147.996
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment was carried out to estimate the environmental and economic impact s of pre-training electrolytic aluminum systems. The technology significantly contributed to non-carcinogens, respiratory inorganics, terrestrial ecotoxicity, global warming and non-renewable energy potential impacts. The technology played only a small role in the adverse impact of carcinogens, aquatic ecotoxicity, and mineral extraction categories, while the influence of the technologies on the way other elements affect the environment was ignorable. Specifically, the emissions from the aluminum oxides production and electricity consumption stages involved played an important role, while potential impact generated from transport, infrastructure, waste treatment, cryolite production, and aluminum fluoride production was quite small. Energy generation based on natural gas is an effective way to minimize overall environment impact. This research indicates that there are high potentials for improving environmental performance of the electrolytic aluminum production in China.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Jingmin Hong
    Zhaohe Yu
    Wenxiao Shi
    Jinglan Hong
    Congcong Qi
    Liping Ye
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 909 - 918
  • [32] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Hong, Jingmin
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Shi, Wenxiao
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (06) : 909 - 918
  • [33] Desulfurisation of gas oil: A case study in environmental and economic assessment
    Burgess, A.A.
    Brennan, D.J.
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2001, 9 (05) : 465 - 472
  • [34] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of alumina recovery from secondary aluminum dross in China
    Zhu, Xueyuan
    Jin, Qiang
    Ye, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
  • [35] Economic and environmental assessment of different hydrogen production and transportation modes
    Sayer, Marlene
    Ajanovic, Amela
    Haas, Reinhard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 65 : 626 - 638
  • [36] An environmental and economic assessment from bioenergy production and biochar application
    Nie, Aiyun
    Kung, Shan-Shan
    Li, Hailing
    Zhang, Liguo
    He, Xiaogang
    Kung, Chih-Chun
    JOURNAL OF SAUDI CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [37] Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of PEX and copper plumbing systems: A case study
    Asadi, Somayeh
    Babaizadeh, Hamed
    Foster, Nolan
    Broun, Reza
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 1228 - 1236
  • [38] Environmental, energy, and economic assessment of Jatropha curcas L. biodiesel production in China
    Yang, Lingyi
    Zhou, Juan
    Pan, Chunyu
    Tu, Qingshi
    Wang, Guangyu
    Duan, Jie
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 470
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of rice bran oil production: a case study in China
    Sun, Li-Hui
    Wang, Yu-Ying
    Gong, Yu-Qing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (26) : 39847 - 39859
  • [40] Economic, environmental, and emergy analysis of China's green tea production
    Xu, Qiang
    Yang, Yi
    Hu, Kelin
    Chen, Ji
    Djomo, Sylvestre Njakou
    Yang, Xiao
    Knudsen, Marie Trydeman
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 269 - 280