An 8-Year Experience of Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (AlloDerm)

被引:277
|
作者
Salzberg, C. Andrew [1 ]
Ashikari, Andrew Y. [1 ]
Koch, R. Michael [1 ]
Chabner-Thompson, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Med Coll, Div Plast Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY; LONG-TERM; EXPANDER/IMPLANT RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TISSUE MATRIX; COMPLICATIONS; ALLOGRAFT; RADIATION; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The advent of skin-and nipple-sparing mastectomy in conjunction with the use of human acellular dermal matrix to provide lower pole coverage has made direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy feasible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term complications associated with this technique. Methods: All human acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant immediate reconstructions performed over an 8-year period were included in this analysis. Patient charts were reviewed for type of mastectomy (oncologic or prophylactic), incision type, complications during follow-up, length of follow-up, rate and type of revision surgery in breasts without postoperative complications, contralateral procedures, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: A total of 466 breasts (260 patients) were reconstructed; 68 percent were prophylactic and 32 percent were oncologic cases. Twenty-one breasts (4.5 percent) received radiotherapy. Mean implant size placed was 412.8 +/- 24.7 cc (range, 150 to 600 cc). Mean follow-up was 28.9 +/- 21.3 months (range, 0.3 to 97.7 months). The overall complication rate was 3.9 percent (implant loss, 1.3 percent; skin breakdown/necrosis, 1.1 percent; hematoma, 1.1 percent; human acellular dermal matrix exposure, 0.6 percent; capsular contracture, 0.4 percent; and infection, 0.2 percent). Type, incidence, and overall rate of complications did not differ significantly between prophylactic and oncologic breasts. Irradiated breasts had a fourfold higher rate of complications. In 354 breasts with more than 1 year of follow-up (mean, 36.7 +/- 18.6 months; range, 12.1 to 97.7 months), there were no long-term complications. Conclusions: Human acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following mastectomy is safe and reliable, with a low overall long-term complication rate. The low incidence of capsular contracture supports the growing body of evidence that human acellular dermal matrix mitigates capsular contracture. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 127: 514, 2011.)
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 524
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safety
    Kalstrup, Julie
    Willert, Cecilie Balslev
    Weitemeyer, Marie Brinch-Moller
    Chakera, Annette Hougaard
    Holmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
    BREAST, 2021, 60 : 192 - 198
  • [2] Direct-to-Implant Single-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: Predictors of Failure
    Gdalevitch, Perry
    Ho, Adelyn
    Genoway, Krista
    Alvrtsyan, Hasmik
    Bovill, Esta
    Lennox, Peter
    Van Laeken, Nancy
    Macadam, Sheina
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (06) : 738E - 747E
  • [3] Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience
    Salzberg, C. Andrew
    Ashikari, Andrew Y.
    Berry, Colleen
    Hunsicker, Lisa M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (02) : 329 - 337
  • [4] Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage
    Jones, Glyn
    Yoo, Aran
    King, Victor
    Jao, Brian
    Wang, Huaping
    Rammos, Charalambos
    Elwood, Eric
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 31S - 38S
  • [5] Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Vardanian, Andrew J.
    Clayton, John L.
    Roostaeian, Jason
    Shirvanian, Vaheh
    Da Lio, Andrew
    Lipa, Joan E.
    Crisera, Christopher
    Festekjian, Jaco H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (05) : 403E - 410E
  • [6] Effect of acellular dermal matrix thickness and surface area on direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
    Kong, Tae Hyun
    Chung, Kyu-Jin
    Kim, Taegon
    Lee, Jun-Ho
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (08) : 1301 - 1308
  • [7] Acellular dermal matrix in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: univariate and multivariate analysis on potential risk factors
    Hansen, Laura
    Paulsen, Jakob Felbo
    Hemmingsen, Mathilde Nejrup
    Herly, Mikkel
    Bredgaard, Rikke
    Gramkow, Christina S.
    Vester-Glowinski, Peter Viktor
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [8] Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without the Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Cost Effective and Oncologically Safe
    Serrurier, L. Charles. J.
    Rayne, Sarah
    Venter, Marisse
    Benn, Carol-Ann
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (04) : 809 - 817
  • [9] Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study
    Brunbjerg, Mette Eline
    Jensen, Thomas Bo
    Overgaard, Jens
    Christiansen, Peer
    Damsgaard, Tine Engberg
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 207 - 218
  • [10] Early Experience of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix after Robot-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Kim, Shin Hyun
    Park, Seonghyuk
    Lee, Dong Won
    Park, Hyung Seok
    Lew, Dae Hyun
    Song, Seung Yong
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (03) : 512 - 520