Optimization of a Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model using Evolutionary Computing methods

被引:0
作者
Ahli, Hamad [1 ]
Merabtene, Tarek [1 ]
Seddique, Mohsin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
来源
2021 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN ESYSTEMS ENGINEERING (DESE) | 2021年
关键词
Evolutionary computing; Global Optimization methods; Conceptual Rainfall-runoff model Tank Model; Particle Swarm Optimization; Genetic Algorithm; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; CATCHMENT; PERFORMANCE; BASINS;
D O I
10.1109/DESE54285.2021.9719369
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in hydrologic modeling is receiving increasing attention to explore new optimization approaches to the complex nonlinear high-dimensional models. This paper presents the application of two evolutionary computing (EC) methods to calibrate the parameter of a conceptual rainfall runoff model (i.e., the Tank model). Tank model has been selected as for several reasons including its simplicity in presenting the runoff processes, its flexible adaption and its capability to produce real catchment hydrograph if suitable parameters' calibration is attained. To this end, two global optimization methods (GOM), the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), are used to optimize the Tank model parameters, applied to actual rainfall runoff hydrograph. The performance of two methods have been compared under different scenarios and environments based on two objective functions namely, the root mean square error (RMSE) and Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE). The results proved the capability of GOM to calibrate the 4-stage Tank model with 16 parameters, even under insufficient data availability (as in the case of UAE watersheds). Both techniques performed satisfactorily with slight superiority of GA over the PSO. Also, NSE proved that it can be considered a superior criterion, to use as objective function, compared to RMSE. The research concludes by recommending the best optimized 16 parameters of the tank model for the selected watershed and provides promising results for UAE watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 431
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Soft Computing Techniques for Rainfall-Runoff Simulation: Local Non-Parametric Paradigm vs. Model Classification Methods [J].
Rezaie-Balf, Mohammad ;
Zahmatkesh, Zahra ;
Kim, Sungwon .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (12) :3843-3865
[32]   Two integrated conceptual-wavelet-based data-driven model approaches for daily rainfall-runoff modelling [J].
Sezen, Cenk ;
Partal, Turgay .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2022, 24 (05) :949-975
[33]   A review of foundational methods for checking the structural identifiability of models: Results for rainfall-runoff [J].
Shin, Mun-Ju ;
Guillaume, Joseph H. A. ;
Croke, Barry F. W. ;
Jakeman, Anthony J. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 520 :1-16
[34]   The usability of the Nash cascade-submerged cascade rainfall-runoff model with regard to other conceptual models [J].
Laskowski, Norbert ;
Kurnatowski, Jacek .
GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 50 (03)
[35]   Rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network approach [J].
Riad, S ;
Mania, J ;
Bouchaou, L ;
Najjar, Y .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2004, 40 (7-8) :839-846
[36]   Automatic Calibration of a Shallow Water Model for Rainfall-Runoff Simulations Using Fast Global Optimization [J].
Hassan, Aziz ;
Tuegel, Franziska ;
Ozgen-Xian, Ilhan ;
Molkenthin, Frank ;
Hinkelmann, Reinhard .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS, 2022, :4647-4655
[37]   Application of a modified conceptual rainfall-runoff model to simulation of groundwater level in an undefined watershed [J].
Hong, Nian ;
Hama, Takehide ;
Suenaga, Yuichi ;
Aqili, Sayed Waliullah ;
Huang, Xiaowu ;
Wei, Qiaoyan ;
Kawagoshi, Yasunori .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 541 :383-390
[38]   Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models by selected differential evolution and particle swarm optimization variants [J].
Jaroslaw J. Napiorkowski ;
Adam P. Piotrowski ;
Emilia Karamuz ;
Tesfaye B. Senbeta .
Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 :2325-2338
[39]   Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm for daily rainfall-runoff forecasting [J].
Sedki, A. ;
Ouazar, D. ;
El Mazoudi, E. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :4523-4527
[40]   Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall-runoff models [J].
Fowler, Keirnan J. A. ;
Peel, Murray C. ;
Western, Andrew W. ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Peterson, Tim J. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (03) :1820-1846