Designation processes for marine protected areas in the coastal wetlands of South Korea

被引:15
作者
Nam, Jungho [2 ]
Ryu, Jongseong [3 ,4 ]
Fluharty, David [3 ]
Koh, Chul-hwan [5 ]
Dyson, Karen [3 ]
Chang, Won Keun [2 ]
Choi, Hee-Jung [2 ]
Kang, Daeseok [6 ]
Khim, Jong Seong [4 ]
Lee, Chang-Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Myongji Univ, Dept Environm Engn & Biotechnol, Yongin 449728, Gyeonngi Do, South Korea
[2] Korea Maritime Inst, Seoul 121270, South Korea
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Marine Affairs, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[4] Korea Univ, Div Environm Sci & Ecol Engn, Seoul 136713, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci Oceanog, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[6] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Ecol Engn, Pusan 608737, South Korea
关键词
RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.002
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The history of Korean tidal flat management and the process for designating Coastal Wetland Protected Areas (CWPAs) are described. Korean coastal wetlands have a long history of intensive use through reclamation for agricultural and industrial uses in the 20th century. Recently, the management policy is shifting away from intensive use towards the conservation of wetlands. This shift is caused by increasing public awareness of the value of wetlands and strong institutional support from the government. Since the Wetlands Conservation Act was passed in 1999, a total of twelve CWPAs have been designated through both top-down and bottom-up processes. Three designation paths are classified based on the relevant drivers, namely government-driven designations (seven CWPAs), local community driven designations (three CWPAs), and conflict resolution (trade-offs) driven designation (two CWPAs). The lessons learned from the designation of Korean CWPAs is that diversification of designation process could facilitate voluntary participation of local stakeholders and thereby enhance the chance of successful implementation of wise use strategy of tidal flats. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 710
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas
    Agardy, T
    Bridgewater, P
    Crosby, MP
    Day, J
    Dayton, PK
    Kenchington, R
    Laffoley, D
    McConney, P
    Murray, PA
    Parks, JE
    Peau, L
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 13 (04) : 353 - 367
  • [2] Agardy T, 2000, B MAR SCI, V66, P875
  • [3] Marine protected areas in Puerto Rico:: Historical and current perspectives
    Aguilar-Perera, Alfonso
    Scharer, Michelle
    Valdes-Pizzini, Manuel
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 49 (12) : 961 - 975
  • [4] Allison GW, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, pS79, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)8[S79:MRANBN]2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1994, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, STILT
  • [8] Starting point or solution? Community-based marine protected areas in the Philippines
    Christie, P
    White, A
    Deguit, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (04) : 441 - 454
  • [9] Community perspectives toward a marine reserve:: A case study of San Felipe, Yucatan, Mexico
    Chuenpagdee, R
    Fraga, J
    Euán-Avila, JI
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [10] Nutrient farming: The business of environmental management
    Hey, DL
    Urban, LS
    Kostel, JA
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 24 (04) : 279 - 287