Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening

被引:165
作者
Sauvaget, Catherine [1 ]
Fayette, Jean-Marie [1 ]
Muwonge, Richard [1 ]
Wesley, Ramani [2 ]
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc, Early Detect & Prevent Sect EDP, Screening Grp SCR, F-69372 Lyon 08, France
[2] Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Community Oncol, Trivandrum 695011, Kerala, India
关键词
Cervical cancer; Diagnostic test performance; Pooled analysis; Screening; Visual inspection; RESOURCE-POOR SETTINGS; DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; ODDS RATIO; FOLLOW-UP; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; PRECURSORS; NEOPLASIA; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To provide an updated estimation of the accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in detecting true disease. Methods: A PubMed search provided original studies on VIA accuracy in which the gold standard for confirmatory testing was histology alone or colposcopy followed by biopsy. The numbers of true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results were extracted from each study. Meta-analyses were then performed with different categories of studies according to confirmatory diagnosis threshold, category of women who received confirmatory testing, and whether a medical condition that could affect VIA accuracy was present at screening. The reference category consisted of 26 studies in which VIA was performed on asymptomatic women who all underwent confirmatory testing and in which the disease threshold was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Results: We report an 80% sensitivity (range, 79%-82%) and a 92% specificity (range, 91%-92%) for VIA. Study region, capacity of screener, or size of the study population did not modify VIA accuracy. The positive predictive value was 10% (range, 9%-10%). Conclusion: Screening for precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions using VIA is a simple, low-cost, and efficient alternative to cytologic testing in low-resource areas. (C) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 24
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DICT EPIDEMIOLOGY
[2]   Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy ;
Muwonge, Richard ;
Keita, Namory ;
Dolo, Amadou ;
Mbalawa, Charles Gombe ;
Nouhou, Hassan ;
Sakande, Boblewende ;
Wesley, Ramani ;
Somanathan, Thara ;
Sharma, Anjali ;
Shastri, Surendra ;
Basu, Parthasarathy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 123 (01) :153-160
[3]   TESTING CERVICOGRAPHY AND CERVICOSCOPY AS SCREENING-TESTS FOR CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
CECCHINI, S ;
BONARDI, R ;
MAZZOTTA, A ;
GRAZZINI, G ;
IOSSA, A ;
CIATTO, S .
TUMORI, 1993, 79 (01) :22-25
[4]  
Denny L, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V89, P826, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<826::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-5
[6]  
Elit L, 2006, J Low Genit Tract Dis, V10, P83, DOI 10.1097/01.lgt.0000210126.08640.4e
[7]   METAANALYSIS OF PAP TEST ACCURACY [J].
FAHEY, MT ;
IRWIG, L ;
MACASKILL, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 141 (07) :680-689
[8]  
Gaffikin L, 1999, LANCET, V353, P869
[9]  
Gaffikin L, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL SURV, V58, P543, DOI 10.1097/00006254-200308000-00022
[10]   Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe [J].
Gaffikin, Lynne ;
McGrath, John ;
Arbyn, Marc ;
Blumenthal, Paul D. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (05) :496-503