Validity of the Morse Fall Scale and the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for fall risk assessment in an acute care setting

被引:22
作者
Kim, Young Ju [1 ]
Choi, Kyoung-Ok [1 ]
Cho, Suk Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Seok Jung [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijenongbu St Marys Hosp, Dept Nursing, Uijenongbu, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Review & Assessment Comm, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
accidental falls; fall risk assessment; Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment tool; Morse Fall Scale; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16185
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and Objectives To evaluate the measured fall risk score that more accurately reflects the changeable conditions in acute care settings, and to efficiently evaluate the association between falls and fall risk score. Background The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is a well-known easy-to-use tool, while the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) consists of items with high specificity. Evaluating suitable fall-risk assessment tools to measure these changeable conditions may contribute to preventing falls in acute care settings. Design Retrospective case-control study using the STROBE checklist. Methods In an acute care setting (708-bedded university hospital with a regional emergency medical centre), the non-fall group was adjusted to fall group using propensity score matching. According to the fall rate of 3-5%, non-fall groups for each tool were selected (1386 and 1947) from the before adjusted data, and the fall groups included 42 and 59. The applied covariates were individual characteristics that ordinarily changed such as age, gender, diagnostic department and hospitalisation period. The adjusted data were analysed using generalised estimating equations and mixed effect model. Results After adjustment, the fall group measured using the JHFRAT had a significantly higher difference between the initial and re-measured total score than the non-fall group. The JHFRAT, especially with the re-measured score, had a higher AUC value for predicting falls than the MFS. MFS's sensitivity was 85.7%, and specificity was 58.8% at 50 points; for JHFRAT, these were 67.8% and 80.2% at 14 points, respectively. These cut-off points were used to evaluate validity during tool development and are commonly used as reference scores. Conclusions JHFRAT more accurately reflects acute changeable conditions related to fall risk measurements after admission. Relevance to clinical practice JHFRAT may be useful for effective fall prevention activities in acute care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:3584 / 3594
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Ghahramani M., 2016, INT J ENG SCI, V5, P1
  • [2] Hagell Peter, 2016, J Appl Meas, V17, P416
  • [3] Longitudinal Evaluation of Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool and Nurses' Experience
    Hur, Eun Young
    Jin, Yinji
    Jin, Taixian
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2017, 32 (03) : 242 - 251
  • [4] Ja Song, Kyung, 2018, [Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research, 임상간호연구], V24, P113, DOI 10.22650/JKCNR.2018.24.1.113
  • [5] Joint Commission International, 2017, INT PAT SAF GOALS
  • [6] Kang Young Ok, 2015, [Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 성인간호학회지], V27, P29
  • [7] A Comparative Study on the Validity of Fall Risk Assessment Scales in Korean Hospitals
    Kim, Keum Soon
    Kim, Jin A.
    Choi, Yun-Kyoung
    Kim, Yu Jeong
    Park, Mi Hwa
    Kim, Hyun-Young
    Song, Mal Soon
    [J]. ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [8] Kim Sung Kyun, 2017, [Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지], V60, P271, DOI 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2016.17531
  • [9] Effects of Nursing Interventions for Fall Prevention in Hospitalized Patients: A Meta analysis
    Kim, Yoon Lee
    Jeong, Seok Hee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2015, 45 (04) : 469 - 482
  • [10] Validity of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Falls on Inpatient Medicine Services
    Klinkenberg, W. Dean
    Potter, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2017, 32 (02) : 108 - 113