Exploring the language heterogeneity strategies of European think tanks

被引:2
作者
Castello-Sirvent, Fernando [1 ]
Manuel Garcia-Garcia, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] ESIC Business & Mkt Sch, Avda Blasco Ibanez 55, Valencia 46021, Spain
关键词
Think tanks; Strategy; Internationalization strategies; Public policy; Eurozone crisis; Economic recovery; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MEDIA; ORGANIZATION; CRISIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121296
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article explores the communication strategies of the main European think tanks who specialise in international economic policy through a study of their linguistic heterogeneity. For this purpose, a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is carried out of 19 European think tanks included in the 2018 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report, an annual ranking produced by the University of Pennsylvania since 2008. The studied result is the number of languages in which the think tanks analysed, which was published in the press worldwide from 2009 to 2018. The information was obtained from the Factiva (R) database, owned by Dow Jones & Company (c), which provides access to more than 33,000 news sources from over 200 countries in 27 languages. The results suggested no necessary conditions for a think tank to articulate its communication strategy, regardless of its level of language heterogeneity. However, the sufficiency analysis showed different causal configurations employed by think tanks in designing their strategies. The evidence shows a wide dispersion of the number of news items, the years of experience of the think tanks and the number of languages employed in their communication strategies from 2009 to 2018.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Gomez Gonzalez-Jover A., 2002, ACT C INT ESP LENG T
[22]   How Important Is the Financial Media in Global Markets? [J].
Griffin, John M. ;
Hirschey, Nicholas H. ;
Kelly, Patrick J. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2011, 24 (12) :3941-3992
[23]  
Henry Teune, 1970, LOGIC COMP SOCIAL IN
[24]   The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism [J].
Jacques, Peter J. ;
Dunlap, Riley E. ;
Freeman, Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 17 (03) :349-385
[25]  
Katz D., 1978, The Social Psychology of Organizations II
[26]  
Kelstrup JD, 2016, ROUTL RES COMP POLIT, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315688602
[27]   Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK [J].
Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2017, 50 (01) :125-137
[28]  
Kent Ray., 2009, The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods, P184, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446249413.N11
[29]   Role for academic institutions and think tanks in speeding progress on sustainable development goals [J].
Kickbusch, Ilona ;
Hanefeld, Johanna .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
[30]  
Lacey R, 2009, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V26, P91, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X(2009)0000026006