Water use efficiency of dryland cowpea, sorghum and sunflower under reduced tillage

被引:19
作者
Moroke, T. S. [1 ]
Schwartz, R. C. [2 ]
Brown, K. W. [3 ]
Juo, A. S. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Content Farm, Minist Agr, Dep Agr Res, Gaborone, Botswana
[2] ARS, USDA, Conservat & Prod Res Lab, Bushland, TX 79012 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dep Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Evapotranspiration; Soil water deficit index; No tillage; Stubble mulch tillage; SOIL-WATER; DROUGHT ADAPTATION; NO-TILLAGE; YIELD; IRRIGATION; SYSTEMS; DEPLETION; FALLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2010.11.008
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Drought-adapted, early maturing crops combined with reduced tillage systems have the potential to stabilize and increase dryland crop yields in semiarid regions of the world. The objectives of this research were to evaluate soil water use and dryland grain yield response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp], sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and sunflower [Annus helianthus (L)] under no tillage (NT) and stubble mulch tillage (SMT) systems. The study was carried out on a Torrertic Paleustoll in the high plains of Texas, USA from 2000 to 2001 when growing season precipitation totaled 47 and 62%, respectively, of the historical mean (317 mm). The experimental design was a split plot, with tillage as the main plot and crop type as the subplot. Soil water contents were measured weekly throughout two growing seasons, from 0.10 to 2.30 m depth at 0.20-m intervals using a neutron moisture meter. Crop water use was calculated as the change in stored soil water plus measured precipitation and assuming negligible runoff and drainage beyond 2.3 m. In 2000, after a 10-month fallow following winter wheat, soil water content at planting was 53 mm greater (P = 0.012) under NT compared with SMT. At harvest, soil water content was greater under cowpea compared with sorghum and sunflower in both tillage systems (P < 0.001). However, greater soil water content at harvest under cowpea did not always result in significantly greater plant available water content the following year compared with sorghum. Differences in water use were dominated by a crop effect (P < 0.028) largely as a result of lower water use by cowpea compared with sorghum and sunflower. Water use of sorghum and sunflower averaged 97 and 29 mm greater than that of cowpea across tillage treatments, respectively. Mean grain water use efficiency (WUE) was greatest for sorghum (1.03 kg m(-3)), followed by cowpea (0.52 kg m(-3)) and sunflower (0.32 kg m(-3)). Sorghum under NT had similar or slightly greater water use, yet consistently greater grain yields compared with SMT. This suggests that a larger fraction of evapotranspiration was diverted to transpiration under NT compared with SMT. Greater residual soil water under cowpea at harvest may increase plant available water the following year provided that the soil has a high soil water storage capacity and slow drainage rates. Tillage effect on soil water use depended on the crop and year, however only sorghum exhibited a significant yield response to increased soil water storage afforded by NT. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 84
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water use efficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau of China in response to crop management
    Zhang, Shulan
    Sadras, Victor
    Chen, Xinping
    Zhang, Fusuo
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 163 : 55 - 63
  • [22] The effect of tillage system and fertilization on corn yield and water use efficiency in irrigated conditions of the South of Ukraine
    Vozhehova, R. A.
    Maliarchuk, M. P.
    Biliaieva, I. M.
    Markovska, O. Y.
    Maliarchuk, A. S.
    Tomnytskyi, A., V
    Lykhovyd, P., V
    Kozyrev, V. V.
    BIOSYSTEMS DIVERSITY, 2019, 27 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [23] Review of 'plant available water' aspects of water use efficiency under irrigated and dryland conditions
    Hensley, M.
    Bennie, A. T. P.
    van Rensburg, L. D.
    Botha, J. J.
    WATER SA, 2011, 37 (05) : 771 - 779
  • [24] Effect of Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Methods on the Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency
    Afzalinia, S.
    Ziaee, A. R.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING: NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND FOOD SECURITY, 2014, 1054 : 119 - 126
  • [25] Dryland maize yields and water use efficiency in response to tillage/crop stubble and nutrient management practices in China
    Wang, Xiaobin
    Dai, Kuai
    Zhang, Dingchen
    Zhang, Xiaoming
    Wang, Yan
    Zhao, Quansheng
    Cai, Dianxiong
    Hoogmoed, W. B.
    Oenema, O.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 120 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [26] Effects of no-tillage on dryland soil water infiltration characteristics under rotation in Loess Plateau
    Guo, Xiaoxia
    Liu, Jinghui
    Tian, Lu
    Li, Lijun
    Zhao, Baoping
    Zhang, Xiangqian
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28 (10): : 112 - 117
  • [27] Planting Date and Hybrid Affect Sugarcane Aphid Infestation, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Dryland Grain Sorghum
    Jenkins, Zane
    Thapa, Sushil
    Bell, Jourdan M.
    Jessup, Kirk E.
    Blaser, Brock C.
    Stewart, Bob A.
    Xue, Qingwu
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [28] PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF COWPEA UNDER WATER STRESS AND REWATERING IN NO-TILLAGE AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    Oliveira de Freitas, Romulo Magno
    Dallabona Dombroski, Jeferson Luiz
    Lopes de Freitas, Francisco Claudio
    Nogueira, Narjara Walessa
    de Souza Pinto, Jose Rivanildo
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2017, 30 (03) : 559 - 567
  • [29] Dryland Pea Production and Water Use Responses to Tillage, Crop Rotation, and Weed Management Practice
    Lenssen, Andrew W.
    Sainju, Upendra M.
    Jabro, Jalal D.
    Allen, Brett L.
    Stevens, William B.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (05) : 1843 - 1853
  • [30] Water use efficiency and cabbage production under no-tillage using different rates of crop residues
    Marouelli, Waldir Aparecido
    Abdalla, Romulo Pitangui
    Madeira, Nuno Rodrigo
    de Oliveira, Aureo Silva
    de Souza, Rodrigo Fernandes
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2010, 45 (04) : 369 - 375