Seismic energy dissipation-based optimum design of tuned mass dampers

被引:37
作者
Bilondi, Mohammad Reza Shayesteh [1 ]
Yazdani, Hessam [2 ]
Khatibinia, Mohsen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birjand, Dept Civil Engn, Birjand, Iran
[2] Howard Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Washington, DC 20059 USA
关键词
Earthquake protective systems; Viscoelastic damper; Dynamic vibration absorbers; Metaheuristic optimization algorithms; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; ALGORITHM; EXCITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-018-2033-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are a subclass of dynamic vibration absorbers that consist of a mass-spring-damper unit that is attached to a structure to adjust its response to seismic and wind loads. The efficacy, performance and optimum design of a TMD strongly depend not only on its mass, stiffness and damping as well as the input energy and the structure characteristics, but also on the structural response parameter(s) that the TMD is intended to mitigate. In that respect, this study evaluates the suitability of four objective functions for the optimum design of the TMD of an inelastic, steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) under an artificial, white-noise excitation. The objective functions include 1) the maximum roof lateral displacement, 2) the maximum drift, 3) the root mean square of drifts and 4) the cumulative hysteretic energy of the SMRF. The results indicate that the SMRF equipped with a TMD optimized using the cumulative hysteretic energy of the SMRF as the objective function exhibits the best seismic response under the artificial earthquake. Further examining the response of the TMD-equipped SMRF under four historic earthquake records shows that equipping a structure with a TMD optimized using an artificial earthquake will not warrant that the structure will exhibit a better seismic performance in all measures compared with when no TMD is used. Put other way, while the minimization of cumulative hysteretic energy could be the best objective function for a case subjected to an artificial earthquake, under real earthquakes, none of the objective functions consistently results in a better seismic performance. This behavior is attributed to detuning effects arising from major structural damages and significant period shifts that occur during strong earthquakes.
引用
收藏
页码:2517 / 2531
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   A modified particle swarm optimizer [J].
Shi, YH ;
Eberhart, R .
1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION - PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :69-73
[42]   Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control [J].
Singh, MP ;
Moreschi, LM .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (04) :955-976
[43]   Tuned mass dampers for response control of torsional buildings [J].
Singh, MP ;
Singh, S ;
Moreschi, LM .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (04) :749-769
[44]  
Tajimi H., P 2 WORLD C EARTHQ E, P781
[47]  
Wirsching P. H., 1973, Computers and Structures, V3, P809, DOI 10.1016/0045-7949(73)90060-6
[48]  
Wirsching P.H., 1974, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V2, P303, DOI [10.1002/eqe.4290020402, DOI 10.1002/EQE.4290020402]
[49]   Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with tuned mass dampers [J].
Wong, K. K. F. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2008, 134 (02) :163-172
[50]   Seismic damage and fragility analysis of structures with tuned mass dampers based on plastic energy [J].
Wong, Kevin K. F. ;
Harris, John L. .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2012, 21 (04) :296-310