Preferences for Professional Development in Science Among Pre- and In-service Primary Teachers: a Best-Worst Scaling Approach

被引:11
作者
Burke, Paul F. [1 ]
Palmer, Tracey-Ann [2 ]
Pressick-Kilborn, Kimberley [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, UTS Business, Fac Business, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney UTS, UTS Business, Fac Arts & Social Sci FASS, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Teacher training; School teachers; Child; Students; Staff development; In-service training; Curriculum; Primary school; elementary school; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; BELIEFS; ATTITUDES; BARRIERS; SCHOOLS; CHOOSE; GIRLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11165-021-10030-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined the preferences for professional development (PD) in primary (elementary) science among pre-service teachers (PSTs) and in-service teachers (ISTs). The contribution of the study is its focus on quantifying the relative importance of factors that were significant for teachers by using best-worst scaling methodology. Rather than considering potential factors in isolation, teachers traded off among content areas of PD, thereby revealing which aspects they most preferred. A comparison of PSTs and ISTs indicated that both sought greater guidance on adapting their science teaching for multi-age classes and on strategies to engage students in activity-based science. Relative to the PSTs, the ISTs reported less need for PD opportunities that emphasized collaboration and networks, and science pedagogy and content. Both groups indicated that they would most benefit from PD that focused on building their knowledge and strategies for teaching guided inquiry and investigation- and activity-based science. The findings offer critical insights into the broader improvement of PD of teachers in the context of science education.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1806
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]   Profiling teachers' continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching [J].
de Vries, Siebrich ;
Jansen, Ellen P. W. A. ;
de Grift, Wim J. C. M. van .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 33 :78-89
[22]   Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures [J].
Desimone, Laura M. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (03) :181-199
[23]   Comparing methods of brand image measurement [J].
Driesener, Carl ;
Romaniuk, Jenni .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2006, 48 (06) :681-698
[24]   DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC CONCERN - THE CASE OF FOOD SAFETY [J].
FINN, A ;
LOUVIERE, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 1992, 11 (02) :12-25
[25]  
Fitzgerald M, 2019, RES SCI EDUC, V49, P543, DOI 10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
[26]   Barriers and Supports for Continuing in Mathematics and Science: Gender and Educational Level Differences [J].
Fouad, Nadya A. ;
Hackett, Gail ;
Smith, Philip L. ;
Kantamneni, Neeta ;
Fitzpatrick, Mary ;
Haag, Susan ;
Spencer, Dee .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 77 (03) :361-373
[27]   What Works in Professional Development? [J].
Guskey, Thomas R. ;
Yoon, Kwang Suk .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2009, 90 (07) :495-500
[28]  
Hackling M.W., 2007, Teaching Science, V53, P12
[29]   Effective Professional Development and Change in Practice: Barriers Science Teachers Encounter and Implications for Reform [J].
Johnson, Carla C. .
SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2006, 106 (03) :150-161
[30]  
Knapp M.S., 2003, Review of Research in Education, V27, P109, DOI [10.3102/0091732X027001109, DOI 10.3102/0091732X027001109]