Stakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (US) dominant regimes

被引:14
作者
Wang, Weifang [1 ]
van Noorloos, Femke [1 ]
Spit, Tejo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Land Value Capture; power relation; stakeholder; public property; private property; URBAN LAND; GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; RESIDENTIAL LAND; POSTREFORM CHINA; VALUE CREATION; LOST FARMERS; FINANCE; MARKET; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding stakeholder power relations-such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments-is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored. Our contribution is a new analytical framework for stakeholder power dynamics surrounding LVC. This provides an empirical analysis by comparing the public (China) and the private (U.S.) dominant regimes, through the perspectives of power direction, strength, and mechanism. To conceptualize the three perspectives of power in LVC, we constructed an analytical matrix and then categorized data in terms of stakeholder, space, and time perspectives. Based on empirical findings, four emerging dilemmas shed light on consequences for LVC policy making as well as areas in need of further research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 145 条
[61]   Optimizing urban land use allocation for planners and real estate developers [J].
Haque, Afsana ;
Asami, Yasushi .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2014, 46 :57-69
[62]   Stakeholder power in industrial symbioses: A stakeholder value network approach [J].
Hein, Andreas M. ;
Jankovic, Marija ;
Feng, Wen ;
Farel, Romain ;
Yune, Jeremy H. ;
Yannou, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 :923-933
[63]   Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis [J].
Hu, Fox Z. Y. ;
Qian, Jiwei .
LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 69 :454-460
[64]   Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: A case study of Xi'an, China [J].
Huang, Xiaojun ;
Huang, Xin ;
He, Yanbing ;
Yang, Xinjun .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 59 :1-9
[65]   Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China [J].
Huang, Zhonghua ;
Du, Xuejun .
CITIES, 2017, 60 :323-332
[66]  
Hui E C., 2004, J. Property Invest. Finance, V22, P76, DOI [10.1108/14635780410525153, DOI 10.1108/14635780410525153]
[67]   The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion [J].
Hui, Eddie Chi Man ;
Bao, Hai Jun ;
Zhang, Xiao Ling .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 32 :309-316
[68]  
Ingram GregoryK., 2012, Value Capture and Land Policies
[69]   The contribution of land exchange institutions and markets in countering farmland abandonment in Japan [J].
Ito, Junichi ;
Nishikori, Mari ;
Toyoshi, Mami ;
Feuer, Hart Nadav .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 57 :582-593
[70]   Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California [J].
Jaeger, William K. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 30 (01) :966-973