Energy mix, technological change, and the environment

被引:6
作者
Bongers, Aneli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Dept Econ, Malaga 29013, Spain
关键词
Energy mix; Emissions; Fossil fuels; Renewable energy; Technological change; FOSSIL-FUEL; SHOCKS; GROWTH; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10018-021-00324-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the relationship between the energy mix and the environment using a theoretical framework in which two alternative energy sources are considered: fossil fuels (dirty energy) and renewable energy (clean energy). We find that a positive aggregate productivity shock increases energy consumption and emissions but reduces energy intensity and emissions per unit of output as renewable energy consumption increases, that is, carbon emissions are procyclical but emissions per unit of output are countercyclical. Second, an energy efficiency improvement provokes a "rebound effect" above 100% (the backfire effect), resulting in a rise of pollutant emissions by increasing energy use. Third, a technological improvement in emissions leads to a reduction in emissions per unit of fossil fuel, but also implies a slow-down in the adoption of renewable energy sources. Finally, we consider the case of a decentralized economy in which the government chooses an optimal specific tax on fossil fuel to maximize social welfare. We show that the "second-best" policy is highly effective in correcting the negative effects of the environmental externality and able to almost achive the centralized economy outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 364
页数:24
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [2] Angelopoulos K., 2010, CESIFO WORKING PAPER
  • [3] First-and second-best allocations under economic and environmental uncertainty
    Angelopoulos, Konstantinos
    Economides, George
    Philippopoulos, Apostolis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2013, 20 (03) : 360 - 380
  • [4] Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model
    Annicchiarico, Barbara
    Di Dio, Fabio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 69 : 1 - 21
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9551-6
  • [6] Prices versus policy: An analysis of the drivers of the primary fossil fuel mix
    Atalla, Tarek
    Blazquez, Jorge
    Hunt, Lester C.
    Manzano, Baltasar
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 106 : 536 - 546
  • [7] Oil supply shocks and the US economy: An estimated DSGE model
    Balke, Nathan S.
    Brown, Stephen P. A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 116 : 357 - 372
  • [8] de Miguel C, 2003, ENERG J, V24, P47
  • [9] Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Springborn, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 62 (03) : 352 - 366
  • [10] Heterogeneity in the rebound effect: Further evidence for Germany
    Frondel, Manuel
    Ritter, Nolan
    Vance, Colin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 461 - 467