Utilizing an electronic feeder to measure individual mineral intake, feeding behavior, and growth performance of cow-calf pairs grazing native range

被引:12
作者
McCarthy, Kacie L. [1 ,3 ]
Undi, Michael [2 ]
Becker, Stephanie [2 ]
Dahlen, Carl R. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Fargo, ND 58102 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Cent Grasslands Res Extens Ctr, Streeter, ND 58483 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Anim Sci, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
cow-calf; grazing; intake; mineral; FREE-CHOICE; FORAGE; CATTLE; SUPPLEMENTATION; SELENIUM; MILK;
D O I
10.1093/tas/txab007
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Crossbred Angus cow-calf pairs (n = 28 pairs) at the Central Grasslands Research Extension Center (Streeter, ND) were used to evaluate an electronic feeder to monitor individual mineral intake and feeding behavior and their relationship with growth performance and liver mineral concentrations. Cows and calves were fitted with radio frequency identification ear tags that allowed access to an electronic feeder (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) and were provided ad libitum minerals (Purina Wind and Rain Storm, Land O'Lakes, Inc., Arden Hills, MN). Mineral intake, number of visits, and duration at the feeder were recorded over a 95-d monitoring period while pairs were grazing native range. Liver biopsies were collected from a subset of cows on the final day of monitoring and analyzed for mineral concentrations. Data were analyzed with the GLM procedure in SAS for mineral intake and feeding behavior with age class (cows vs. calves), intake category (high vs. low), and the interaction between class and category in the model. Correlations were calculated among cow feeding behavior and calf intake and growth performance with the CORR procedure, and a comparison of liver mineral concentrations among cows of high (>90 g/d; average 125.4 g/d) and low (<90 g/d; average 33.5 g/d) mineral intake was performed using the GLM procedure. High-intake calves (>50 g/d; average 72.2 g/d) consumed greater (P < 0.001) amounts of minerals than low-intake calves (< 50 g/d; average 22.2 g/d) intake calves. Cows and calves attended the mineral feeder a similar (P = 0.71) proportion of the days during the experiment (overall mean of 20%, or once every 5 d). On days calves visited the feeder, they consumed less (P < 0.01) minerals than cows (222 +/- 27 vs. 356 +/- 26 g/d, respectively). Over the grazing period, calves gained 1.17 +/- 0.02 kg/d, whereas cows lost 0.35 +/- 0.02 kg/d. Calf mineral intake was correlated with cow duration at the mineral feeder (r = 0.403, P = 0.05). Cows with high mineral intake had greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of Se (2.92 vs. 2.41 ug/g), Cu (247 vs. 116 ug/g), and Co (0.51 vs. 0.27 ug/g) compared with low mineral intake cows, but liver concentrations of Fe, Zn, Mo, and Mn did not differ (P = 0.22). We were able to successfully monitor individual mineral intake and feeding behavior with the electronic feeder evaluated, and the divergence in mineral intake observed with the feeder was corroborated by concentrations of minerals in the liver.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2016, Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. Method 952.03-Tannin in distilled liquors-spectrophotometric method (26.1.37), V20th
[2]   NUTRITIVE VALUE OF FORAGE AND DIETS OF SHEEP AND CATTLE FROM OREGON SUBCLOVER-GRASS MIXTURES [J].
BEDELL, TE .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1971, 24 (02) :125-+
[3]   EFFECTS OF MILK AND FORAGE INTAKE ON CALF PERFORMANCE [J].
BOGGS, DL ;
SMITH, EF ;
SCHALLES, RR ;
BRENT, BE ;
CORAH, LR ;
PRUITT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1980, 51 (03) :550-553
[4]  
Bowman JGP, 1997, J ANIM SCI, V75, P543
[5]   Influence of advancing season on dietary composition, intake, site of digestion, and microbial efficiency in beef steers grazing a native range in western North Dakota [J].
Cline, H. J. ;
Neville, B. W. ;
Lardy, G. P. ;
Caton, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (01) :375-383
[6]   Individual intake of mineral and molasses supplements by cows, heifers and calves [J].
Cockwill, CL ;
McAllister, TA ;
Olson, ME ;
Milligan, DN ;
Ralston, BJ ;
Huisma, C ;
Hand, RK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (04) :681-690
[7]  
Corah L. R., 1996, Forage Analyses from Cow/Calf Herds in 18 States: Beef Cow/Calf Health & Productivity Audit
[8]  
Engle TE, 2000, J ANIM SCI, V78, P2446
[9]  
Greene L.W., 2000, J ANIM SCI, V77, P1, DOI [DOI 10.2527/JAS2000.00218812007700ES0013X, 10.2527/jas2000.00218812007700es0013x, 10.2527/jas2000.00218812007700ES0013x]
[10]   Mineral dynamics in forages of the Northern Great Plains [J].
Grings, EE ;
Haferkamp, MR ;
Heitschmidt, RK ;
Karl, MG .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 49 (03) :234-240