Portfolio SAT and SMT Solving of Cardinality Constraints in Sensor Network Optimization

被引:3
作者
Kovasznai, Gergely [1 ]
Gajdar, Krisztian [1 ]
Kovacs, Laura [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Eszterhazy Karoly Univ, Eger, Hungary
[2] TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
[3] Chalmers Univ Technol, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
2019 21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYMBOLIC AND NUMERIC ALGORITHMS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (SYNASC 2019) | 2020年
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1109/SYNASC49474.2019.00021
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) serve as the basis for Internet of Things applications. A WSN consists of a number of spatially distributed sensor nodes, which cooperatively monitor physical or environmental conditions. In order to ensure the dependability of WSN functionalities, several reliability and security requirements have to be fulfilled. In previous work, we applied OMT (Optimization Modulo Theories) solvers to maximize a WSN's lifetime, i.e., to generate an optimal sleep/wake-up scheduling for the sensor nodes. We discovered that the bottleneck for the underlying SMT (Satisfiability Modulo Theories) solvers was typically to solve satisfiable instances. In this paper, we encode the WSN verification problem as a set of Boolean cardinality constraints, therefore SAT solvers can also be applied as underlying solvers. We have experimented with different SAT solvers and also with different SAT encodings of Boolean cardinality constraints. Based on our experiments, the SAT-based approach is very powerful on satisfiable instances, but quite poor on unsatisfiable ones. In this paper, we apply both SAT and SMT solvers in a portfolio setting. Based on our experiments, the MiniCARD+Z3 setting can be considered to be the most powerful one, which outperforms OMT solvers by 1-2 orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 91
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 8 INT C MOB UB COM
[2]   Cardinality Networks: a theoretical and empirical study [J].
Asin, Roberto ;
Nieuwenhuis, Robert ;
Oliveras, Albert ;
Rodriguez-Carbonell, Enric .
CONSTRAINTS, 2011, 16 (02) :195-221
[3]  
Audemard G, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8561, P197, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_15
[4]  
Bailleux O, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2833, P108
[5]  
Barrett Clark, 2011, Computer Aided Verification. Proceedings 23rd International Conference, CAV 2011, P171, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_14
[6]  
Barrett C., 2017, SMT LIB STANDARD VER
[7]  
Benenson Z., 2007, SER MDM07, P146, DOI [10.1109/MDM.2007.29, DOI 10.1109/MDM.2007.29]
[8]  
Biere A., 2017, Proceedings of SAT Competition 2017: Solver and Benchmarks Descriptions, P14
[9]  
Biro C., 2014, P INT C APPL INF ICA, P101
[10]   EQUIVALENCE OF STRONGLY CONNECTED GRAPHS AND BLACK-AND-WHITE 2-SAT PROBLEMS [J].
Biro, Csaba ;
Kusper, Gabor .
MISKOLC MATHEMATICAL NOTES, 2018, 19 (02) :755-768