A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression

被引:611
作者
Manea, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Gilbody, Simon
McMillan, Dean
机构
[1] Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Depression; Screening; Questionnaire; Psychometrics; Meta-analysis; PRIMARY-CARE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; ANXIETY; HETEROGENEITY; ACCURACY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: The depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used depression screening instrument in nonpsychiatric settings. The PHQ-9 can be scored using different methods, including an algorithm based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria and a cut-off based on summed-item scores. The algorithm was the originally proposed scoring method to screen for depression. We summarized the diagnostic test accuracy of the PHQ-9 using the algorithm scoring method across a range of validation studies and compared the diagnostic properties of the PHQ-9 using the algorithm and summed scoring method at the proposed cut-off point of 10. Methods: We performed a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies of the PHQ-9 using the algorithm scoring method to detect major depressive disorder (MDD). We used meta-analytic methods to calculate summary sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios for diagnosing MDD of the PHQ-9 using algorithm scoring method. In studies that reported both scoring methods (algorithm and summed-item scoring at proposed cut-off point of >= 10), we compared the diagnostic properties of the PHQ-9 using these methods. Results: We found 27 validation studies that validated the algorithm scoring method of the PHQ-9 in various settings. There was substantial heterogeneity across studies, which makes the pooled results difficult to interpret. In general, sensitivity was low whereas specificity was good. Thirteen studies reported the diagnostic properties of the PHQ-9 for both scoring methods. Pooled sensitivity for algorithm scoring method was lower while specificities were good for both scoring methods. Heterogeneity was consistently high; therefore, caution should be used when interpreting these results. Interpretation: This review shows that, if the algorithm scoring method is used, the PHQ-9 has a low sensitivity for detecting MDD. This could be due to the rating scale categories of the measure, higher specificity or other factors that warrant further research. The summed-item score method at proposed cut-off point of >= 10 has better diagnostic performance for screening purposes or where a high sensitivity is needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   The patient health questionnaire, Japanese version: Validity according to the mini-international neuropsychiatric interview-plus [J].
Muramatsu, Kumiko ;
Miyaoka, Hitoshi ;
Kamijima, Kunitoshi ;
Muramatsu, Yoshiyuki ;
Yoshida, Masahito ;
Otsubo, Tempei ;
Gejyo, Fumitake .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2007, 101 (03) :952-960
[32]   Depressive and anxiety disorders in chronic hepatitis C patients: Reliability and validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire [J].
Navines, R. ;
Castellvi, P. ;
Moreno-Espana, J. ;
Gimenez, D. ;
Udina, M. ;
Canizares, S. ;
Diez-Quevedo, C. ;
Valdes, M. ;
Sola, R. ;
Martin-Santos, R. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 138 (03) :343-351
[33]   Anxiety and mood disorders in otorhinolaryngology outpatients presenting with dizziness: Validation of the self-administered PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire and epidemiology [J].
Persoons, P ;
Luyckx, K ;
Desloovere, C ;
Vandenberghe, J ;
Fischler, B .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 25 (05) :316-323
[34]   Screening for depressive disorders in patients with skin diseases: A comparison of three screeners [J].
Picardi, A ;
Adler, DA ;
Abeni, D ;
Chang, H ;
Pasquini, P ;
Rogers, WH ;
Bungay, KM .
ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2005, 85 (05) :414-419
[35]   Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews [J].
Reitsma, JB ;
Glas, AS ;
Rutjes, AWS ;
Scholten, RJPM ;
Bossuyt, PM ;
Zwinderman, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (10) :982-990
[36]   Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy [J].
Song, FJ ;
Khan, KS ;
Dinnes, J ;
Sutton, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :88-95
[37]   Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD - The PHQ primary care study [J].
Spitzer, RL ;
Kroenke, K ;
Williams, JBW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (18) :1737-1744
[38]   Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Stafford, Lesley ;
Berk, Michael ;
Jackson, Henry J. .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 29 (05) :417-424
[39]   Screening for Major Depression in Cancer Outpatients The Diagnostic Accuracy of the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire [J].
Thekkumpurath, Parvez ;
Walker, Jane ;
Butcher, Isabella ;
Hodges, Laura ;
Kleiboer, Annet ;
O'Connor, Mark ;
Wall, Lucy ;
Murray, Gordon ;
Kroenke, Kurt ;
Sharpe, Michael .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (01) :218-227
[40]   Optimizing Detection of Major Depression Among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Using the Patient Health Questionnaire: Data from the Heart and Soul Study [J].
Thombs, Brett D. ;
Ziegelstein, Roy C. ;
Whooley, Mary A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (12) :2014-2017