Evaluation of Postorthodontic Changes in the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using the PAR Index

被引:10
作者
Trimetsuntorn, Kunakorn [1 ]
Manosudprasit, Amornrut [1 ]
Manosudprasit, Aggasit [1 ]
Phaoseree, Natthawee [1 ]
Pisek, Araya [2 ]
Pisek, Poonsak [1 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Dent, Orthodont Dept, Dept Prevent Dent, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prevent Dent, Div Dent Publ Hlth, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
postorthodontic changes; stability; cleft; dental; relapse; ARCH WIDTH; STABILITY; RELAPSE; RETENTION; SURGERY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/1055665619860038
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate dental changes in cleft patients after undergoing orthodontic treatment for at least 2 years. Hypothesis: The dental change would decline significantly after 2 years of completing orthodontic treatment. Design: This is a retrospective study. Patient: Eighteen repaired cleft lip and palate patients from the Faculty of Dentistry, KhonKaen University, Thailand, participated in this study. Mean Outcome Measures: A dental model with before treatment (T0), completed treatment (T1), and retention period (T2) data was analyzed using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Result: The results showed that the PAR score improved enormously after treatment; from T0 to T1, it was 34.00 +/- 10.01 to 4.67 +/- 2.47, and there was a reversion in the retention period. There was statistical significance between T0, T1, and T2, with P values <.001, .005, and <.001 when comparing T0 with T1, T1 with T2, and T0 with T2, respectively. Conclusion: Occlusion in cleft lip and palate patients changed from the time of completing treatment to the final results after the retention period. To sustain satisfactory results, orthodontists should plan carefully for the retention period before performing the treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Relapse tendency in maxillary arch width in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with different maxillary arch forms [J].
Al-Gunaid, Talat ;
Asahito, Toshikazu ;
Yamaki, Masaki ;
Hanada, Kooji ;
Takagi, Ritsuo ;
Ono, Kazuhiro ;
Saito, Isao .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2008, 45 (03) :278-283
[2]  
BERKOWITZ S., 2006, Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management
[3]  
Boo-Chai K, 1971, Br J Plast Surg, V24, P250, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1226(71)80065-6
[4]  
Capelozza L, 1996, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V33, P51, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1996)033<0051:IIOLAP>2.3.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery-which one is more stable in 5 years? [J].
Chua, Hannah Daile P. ;
Hagg, Margareta Bendeus ;
Cheung, Lim Kwong .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 109 (06) :803-814
[7]   Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment [J].
Deguchi, T ;
Honjo, T ;
Fukunaga, T ;
Miyawaki, S ;
Roberts, WE ;
Takano-Yamamoto, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (04) :434-443
[8]   Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions [J].
Janson G. ;
Araki J. ;
Estelita S. ;
Camardella L.T. .
Progress in Orthodontics, 15 (1) :67
[9]   Characteristics of Maxillary Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Compared to Normal Subjects and Skeletal Class III Patients [J].
Jiang, Chanyuan ;
Yin, Ningbei ;
Zheng, Yilue ;
Song, Tao .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (06) :517-523
[10]  
Kanuru Ravi Krishna, 2016, J Contemp Dent Pract, V17, P587