Managing the 2-week wait for breast patients

被引:4
作者
Singhal, Rishi [1 ]
Marudanayagam, Ranti [1 ]
Balasubramaman, B. [1 ]
Paterson, I. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heart England NHS Fdn Trust, Breast Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
breast cancer; 2-week wait; fast-track;
D O I
10.1308/003588408X242015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Published data suggest that the 2-week wait system and triple assessment at one fast-track clinic visit is an out-dated method of capturing disease from a referral population. These studies report up to 32% of breast cancer coming from routine referrals. It has been recommended, therefore, that all breast referrals should be seen within 2 weeks. The sheer volume of referrals are likely to prevent this target being achieved. The aim of this study was to analyse the performance of our fast-track system. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull fast-track clinics were set up in 1999 with a prospective audit system. The data from this audit were retrospectively analysed and cross-referenced with the cancer data base to determine the referral origin of breast cancers from November 1999 to February 2005. RESULTS A total of 14,303 (fast-track, n = 6678; routine referral, n = 7625) patients were seen over a 5-year period. Overall, 1095 cancers (91.8% of the total) came from the fast-track clinics which had a pick-up rate of 16.4% compared with 98 cancers (8.2% of the total) and a pick-up rate of 1.3% for routine referrals (P < 0.001). The appropriateness of fast-track referral was also analysed which showed that 14.4% of cancers were detected if the referral criteria were met compared to 0.55% if they were inappropriate (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The traditional fast-track, triple assessment breast clinic is an efficient and well-structured way of diagnosing disease. We recommend that the two system referral pattern should continue.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 71
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ALBERTS JCJ, 1999, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V25, P652
[2]  
BROWN V, 2001, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V27, P790
[3]   Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic [J].
Cant, PJ ;
Yu, DSL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (08) :1082-1086
[4]   Implementing the 2-week wait rule for cancer referral in the UK: general practitioners' views and practices. [J].
Dodds, W ;
Morgan, M ;
Wolfe, C ;
Raju, KS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2004, 13 (01) :82-87
[5]  
*HLTH SERV CIRC, 1998, 1998242 HSC
[6]  
IMKAMPE A, 2004, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V30, P1036
[7]  
ISGAR B, 1999, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V25, P664
[8]   Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? Not too well [J].
Jones, R ;
Rubin, G ;
Hungin, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7302) :1555-1556
[9]  
KALBASSI R, 2003, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V29, P822
[10]   Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference? [J].
Khawaja, AR ;
Allan, SM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 26 (06) :536-539