Brief report: Patterns of prosocial behaviors in middle childhood predicting peer relations during early adolescence

被引:26
作者
Ma, Ting-Lan [1 ]
Zarrett, Nicole [2 ]
Simpkins, Sandra [3 ]
Vandell, Deborah L. [3 ]
Jiang, Su [3 ]
机构
[1] Edgewood Coll, Educ Leadership Doctoral Program, 1255 Deming Way, Madison, WI 53717 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Educ, 200 Educ Bldg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Prosocial behaviors; Victimization; Aggression; Bullying; Latent profiles; WITHDRAWN; CHILDREN; VICTIMS; BULLIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.11.004
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Introduction Early adolescence is a developmental period in which peer victimization, bullying, relational aggression, and social exclusion are particularly prominent. As these behaviors have long-term implications for children, in this study, we investigated early variations of prosocial behaviors as one of the critical precedents that shape youth's subsequent peer relational outcomes. Specifically, we identified different profiles of prosocial behaviors in middle childhood (Grade 4) and related these profiles to peer relationships in early adolescence (Grade 6). Method: Using longitudinal data from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (N = 914; 52% girls), a three-step latent profile analysis was conducted on Grade 4 prosocial behaviors, which were then related to Grade 6 teacher- and student-rated peer relationships (e.g., relational aggression). Results: Four patterns of prosocial behaviors emerged: low prosocial (18%), high prosocial (67%), primarily friendly (8%), and primarily kind (7%). These four patterns of prosocial behaviors were differentially related to later problematic peer relationships: Low prosocial youth demonstrated the most problematic peer relationships (Mdiff = 0.36-0.93, all p < .001). Primarily friendly (but not kind) youth displayed more general and relational aggression (Mdiff = 0.22, SE = 0.07, p = .002; and Mdiff = 0.18, SE = 0.06, p = .006, respectively). Conclusion: Both low prosocial and primarily friendly youth are at risk for displaying peer-related problems; interventions that build prosocial behaviors in youth with a low prosocial or primarily friendly profile may help prevent problematic peer relationships at early adolescence.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHILD CAR CHILD DEV
[2]  
Asparouhov Tihomir, 2014, MPLUS WEB NOTES, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
[3]  
Baker E. R., 2018, EARLY CHILD DEV CARE, P1
[4]   Aggressive and Prosocial? Examining Latent Profiles of Behavior, Social Status, Machiavellianism, and Empathy [J].
Berger, Christian ;
Batanova, Milena ;
Duncan Cance, Jessica .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2015, 44 (12) :2230-2244
[5]   Children's Theory of Mind, Self-Perceptions, and Peer Relations: A Longitudinal Study [J].
Bosacki, Sandra Leanne .
INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 24 (02) :175-188
[6]   The protective role of prosocial behaviors on antisocial behaviors: The mediating effects of deviant peer affiliation [J].
Carlo, Gustavo ;
Vicenta Mestre, Maria ;
McGinley, Meredith M. ;
Tur-Porcar, Ana ;
Samper, Paula ;
Opal, Deanna .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2014, 37 (04) :359-366
[7]   Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression [J].
Closson, Leanna M. ;
Hymel, Shelley .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 2016, 45 (09) :1836-1848
[8]  
Collins L. M., 2010, HDB CHILD PSYCHOL, P701
[9]   Emotion, regulation, and moral development [J].
Eisenberg, N .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :665-697
[10]  
Eisenberg N., 2015, HDB CHILD PSYCHOL DE, V7th Edn