New-onset Diabetes After Distal Pancreatectomy A Systematic Review

被引:85
作者
De Bruijn, Kirstin M. J. [1 ]
van Eijck, Casper H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
distal pancreatectomy; new-onset diabetes; systematic review; CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; ENDOCRINE FUNCTION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; RISK-FACTORS; RESECTION; MELLITUS; SURGERY; BENIGN; METAANALYSIS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000000819
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The true rate of new-onset diabetes (NODM) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is not known. This systematic review was carried out to obtain exact percentages regarding the incidence of NODM after DP for different indications. Background: Distal pancreatectomy is the standard procedure for removal of benign or (potentially) malignant lesions from the pancreatic body or tail and increasingly used for removal of often benign lesions. It is associated with low mortality rates, though postoperative diabetes remains a serious problem. Methods: Embase, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for articles reporting incidence of NODM after DP. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by means of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies and the Moga scale for case series. Mean weighted overall percentages of NODM after DP for different indications were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and corresponding P values. Results: Twenty-six studies were included, comprising 1.731 patients undergoing DP. The average cumulative incidence of NODM after DP performed for chronic pancreatitis was 39% and for benign or (potentially) malignant lesions it was 14%. Comparing the proportions of these 2 groups showed a significant difference (95% CI: 0.351-0.434 and 0.110-0.172, respectively, P < 0.000). The average percentage of insulin-dependent diabetes among patients with NODM after DP was 77%. Conclusions: This review is the largest of its kind to assess the cumulative incidence of NODM after DP and shows that NODM is a frequently occurring complication, with incidence depending on the preexisting disease and follow-up time. Because NODM can affect quality of life, patients undergoing DP should be preoperatively provided with this information as specific as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 861
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Distal pancreatic resection - Indications, techniques and complications [J].
Adam, U ;
Makowiec, F ;
Riediger, H ;
Trzeczak, S ;
Benz, S ;
Hopt, UT .
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2001, 126 (11) :908-912
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA
[3]   Nonstandard pancreatic resections for unusual lesions [J].
Aranha, GV ;
Shoup, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 189 (02) :223-228
[4]   Surgical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreatic body [J].
Balzano, G ;
Zerbi, A ;
Veronesi, P ;
Cristallo, M ;
Di Carlo, V .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 20 (06) :506-510
[5]   Early and late postoperative changes in the quality of life after pancreatic surgery [J].
Belyaev, Orlin ;
Herzog, Torsten ;
Chromik, Ansgar M. ;
Meurer, Kirsten ;
Uhl, Waldemar .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (04) :547-555
[6]  
Brennan MF, 1996, ANN SURG, V223, P506, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199605000-00006
[7]  
Byrne RL, 1997, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V79, P405
[8]   Pancreatogenic Diabetes: Special Considerations for Management [J].
Cui, YunFeng ;
Andersen, Dana K. .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2011, 11 (03) :279-294
[9]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality in breast and colorectal cancer [J].
de Bruijn, K. M. J. ;
Arends, L. R. ;
Hansen, B. E. ;
Leeflang, S. ;
Ruiter, R. ;
van Eijck, C. H. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (11) :1421-1429
[10]   Better preservation of endocrine function after central versus distal pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions [J].
DiNorcia, Joseph ;
Ahmed, League ;
Lee, Minna K. ;
Reavey, Patrick L. ;
Yakaitis, Elizabeth A. ;
Lee, James A. ;
Schrope, Beth A. ;
Chabot, John A. ;
Allendorf, John D. .
SURGERY, 2010, 148 (06) :1247-1254