Comparative life cycle environmental impact assessment of renewable electricity generation systems: A practical approach towards Europe, North America and Oceania

被引:15
|
作者
Mahmud, M. A. Parvez [1 ]
Farjana, Shahjadi Hisan [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
关键词
Renewable -energy technologies; Life -cycle assessment; Environmental performance; Greenhouse -gas emission; Uncertainty analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; POLYMER SOLAR-CELLS; ASSESSMENT LCA; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; WIND POWER; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; METHODOLOGY; INVENTORIES; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The choice of a power plant in different nations depends on the required resources availability, abun-dance, and reliability. It is evident that renewable energy generation resources provide a more sus-tainable solution than the fossil fuels. However, as a complete system, renewable energy generation systems also have some overall environmental impacts on humankind and ecosystems. The main objective of this paper is to addresses the environmental effects caused by different types of renewable energy generation systems through process-based life-cycle impact analysis. A comparative study is carried out among different renewable energy generation technologies which include wind, photovol-taic, biomass, and hydro power. Life-cycle impact analysis has been carried out by Institute of Envi-ronmental Sciences (CML), Eco-indicator 99, Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and Ecopoints 97 approaches. The superiority of this work is creating a comprehensive life-cycle inventory following a reliable global database, assessing the impacts for about 10 midpoint impact categories and three endpoint indicators, and taking account of the fossil-fuel-based energy consumption rate of each plant. The key findings reveal that photovoltaic power plants have the highest environmental impacts in the types of ozone layer depletion, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity and marine aquatic ecotoxicity, while biomass plants impact on the categories of abiotic depletion, global warming, photochemical oxidation, acidification, and eutrophication. Moreover, the wind power plants have the more significant environ-mental effect on human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity types. Overall, hydropower plants are found to be much more environment-friendly than other renewable electricity generation systems.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1120
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy systems for the provision of heating, cooling and electricity in buildings: A comparative analysis
    Herrando, Maria
    Elduque, Daniel
    Javierre, Carlos
    Fueyo, Norberto
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 257
  • [42] Environmental impact assessment model for substitution of hazardous substances by using life cycle approach
    Oguzcan, Semih
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Tugnoli, Alessandro
    Kruopiene, Jolita
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2019, 254
  • [43] Towards the determination of metal criticality in home-based battery systems using a Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Terlouw, Tom
    Zhang, Xiaojin
    Bauer, Christian
    Alskaif, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 221 : 667 - 677
  • [44] COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS UTILIZATION FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1498 - 1510
  • [45] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass utilization for electricity generation in the European Union and the United States
    Beagle, E.
    Belmont, E.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 267 - 275
  • [46] The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production in New York State from Distributed Solar Photovoltaic Systems
    Ali, Atif
    Koch, Theodore W.
    Volk, Timothy A.
    Malmsheimer, Robert W.
    Eisenbies, Mark H.
    Kloster, Danielle
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Naim, Nehan
    Therasme, Obste
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [47] Comparison of Environmental Impact of Three Different Slab Systems for Life Cycle Assessment of a Commercial Building in South Korea
    Paik, Inkwan
    Na, Seunguk
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 16
  • [48] Environmental Impact Evaluation of Distributed Renewable Energy System Based on Life Cycle Assessment and Fuzzy Rough Sets
    Li, Chengzhou
    Wang, Ningling
    Zhang, Hongyuan
    Liu, Qingxin
    Chai, Youguo
    Shen, Xiaohu
    Yang, Zhiping
    Yang, Yongping
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (21)
  • [49] Ecological efficiency of renewable and non-renewable energy generation power systems considering life cycle assessment
    Caio Felipe de Paula Santos
    Thiago Averaldo Bimestre
    Celso Eduardo Tuna
    José Luz Silveira
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2022, 44
  • [50] Towards More Holistic Environmental Impact Assessment: Hybridisation of Life Cycle Assessment and Quantitative Risk Assessment
    Kobayashi, Yumi
    Peters, Greg M.
    Khan, Stuart J.
    22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 : 378 - 383