Cynefin as Reference Framework to Facilitate Insight and Decision-Making in Complex Contexts of Biomedical Research

被引:16
|
作者
Kempermann, Gerd [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis DZNE Dresden, Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, CRTD, Dresden, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
complexity; decision making; neurodegeneration; management; systems biology; systems medicine; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; DIAGNOSIS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2017.00634
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The Cynefin scheme is a concept of knowledge management, originally devised to support decision making in management, but more generally applicable to situations, in which complexity challenges the quality of insight, prediction, and decision. Despite the fact that life itself, and especially the brain and its diseases, are complex to the extent that complexity could be considered their cardinal feature, complex problems in biomedicine are often treated as if they were actually not more than the complicated sum of solvable sub-problems. Because of the emergent properties of complex contexts this is not correct. With a set of clear criteria Cynefin helps to set apart complex problems from "simple/obvious," "complicated," "chaotic," and "disordered" contexts in order to avoid misinterpreting the relevant causality structures. The distinction comes with the insight, which specific kind of knowledge is possible in each of these categories and what are the consequences for resulting decisions and actions. From student's theses over the publication and grant writing process to research politics, misinterpretation of complexity can have problematic or even dangerous consequences, especially in clinical contexts. Conceptualization of problems within a straightforward reference language like Cynefin improves clarity and stringency within projects and facilitates communication and decision-making about them.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fairness decision-making of opportunity equity in gain and loss contexts
    Yang, Zhong
    Zheng, Ya
    Wang, Chunsheng
    Lai, Xinyu
    Hu, Kesong
    Li, Qi
    Liu, Xun
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 98
  • [42] Leadership in a Performative Context: A framework for decision-making
    Chitpin, Stephanie
    Jones, Ken
    EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2015, 47 (04) : 387 - 401
  • [43] A decision-making framework for justifying a portfolio of IT projects
    Pendharkar, Parag C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (04) : 625 - 639
  • [44] Methods for analyzing decision-making: a framework approach
    Jon Nyhlén
    Gustav Lidén
    Quality & Quantity, 2014, 48 : 2523 - 2535
  • [45] Framework for rational decision-making in bridge maintenance
    Liljefors, Frida
    Koehler, Jochen
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [46] Exploring entrepreneurial decision-making and behaviour: contexts, processes and dynamics
    Caputo, Andrea
    Pellegrini, Massimiliano M.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (05) : 913 - 918
  • [47] The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework
    Greer R.
    von Wirth T.
    Loorbach D.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (2): : 693 - 718
  • [48] An efficient decision-making framework for hybrid metamodelling
    Chen, Chong
    Zhan, Zhenfei
    Yu, Huili
    Zhao, Hui
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2019, 51 (10) : 1761 - 1776
  • [49] Serotonin promotes exploitation in complex environments by accelerating decision-making
    Iwanir, Shachar
    Brown, Adam S.
    Nagy, Stanislav
    Najjar, Dana
    Kazakov, Alexander
    Lee, Kyung Suk
    Zaslaver, Alon
    Levine, Erel
    Biron, David
    BMC BIOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [50] Modelling Adaptive and Anticipatory Human Decision-Making in Complex Human-Environment Systems
    Madsen, Jens Koed
    Powers, Brian
    Bailey, Richard
    Carrella, Ernesto
    Payette, Nicolas
    Pilditch, Toby
    JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2023, 26 (04):