Indirect printing of hierarchical patient-specific scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering

被引:6
作者
Costa, Joao B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silva-Correia, Joana [1 ,2 ]
Pina, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
Morais, Alain da Silva [1 ,2 ]
Vieira, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Helder [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Espregueira-Mendes, Joao [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Reis, Rui L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Oliveira, Joaquim M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, 3Bs Res Grp, I3Bs Res Inst Biomat Biodegradables & Biomimet, Headquarters European Inst Excellence Tissue Engn, AvePk, P-4805017 Barco Gmr, Portugal
[2] ICVS 3Bs PT Govt Associate Lab, Braga, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, Discoveries Ctr Regenerat & Precis Med, Avepk, P-4805017 Barco, Guimaraes, Portugal
[4] Murcia Madrid FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Ripoll & De Prado Sports Clin, Murcia, Spain
[5] Ctr Hosp Povoa de Varzim, Dept Orthoped, Vila Do Conde, Portugal
[6] FIFA Med Ctr Excellence, Clin Dragao, Espregueira Mendes Sports Ctr, Porto, Portugal
[7] Dom Henrique Res Ctr, Porto, Portugal
[8] Univ Minho, Dept Orthoped, Braga, Portugal
关键词
Patient-specific; Indirect printing; Hierarchical; Silk fibroin; Enzymatic-cross-linking; Meniscus; SILK SCAFFOLDS; INDIRECT FABRICATION; IN-VITRO; POROSITY; BIOMATERIALS; REGENERATION; REPLACEMENT; DEGRADATION; HYDROGELS; TEARS;
D O I
10.1007/s42242-019-00050-x
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The complex meniscus tissue plays a critical role in the knee. The high susceptibility to injury has led to an intense pursuit for better tissue engineering regenerative strategies, where scaffolds play a major role. In this study, indirect printed hierarchical multilayered scaffolds composed by a silk fibroin (SF) upper layer and an 80/20 (w/w) ratio of SF/ionic-doped beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bottom layer were developed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between two types of scaffolds produced using different SF concentrations, i.e., 8% (w/v) (Hi8) and 16% (w/v) (Hi16) was performed. In terms of architecture and morphology, the produced scaffolds presented homogeneous porosity in both layers and no differences were observed when comparing both scaffolds. A decrease in terms of mechanical performance of the scaffolds was observed when SF concentration decreased from 16 to 8% (w/v). Hi16 revealed a static compressive modulus of 0.66 +/- 0.05 MPa and dynamical mechanical properties ranging from 2.17 +/- 0.25 to 3.19 +/- 0.38 MPa. By its turn, Hi8 presented a compressive modulus of 0.27 +/- 0.08 MPa and dynamical mechanical properties ranging from 1.03 +/- 0.08 MPa to 1.56 +/- 0.13 MPa. In vitro bioactivity studies showed formation of apatite crystals onto the surface of Hi8 and Hi16 bottom layers. Human meniscus cells (hMCs) and human primary osteoblasts were cultured separately onto the top layer (SF8 and SF16) and bottom layer ( SF8/TCP and SF16/TCP) of the hierarchical scaffolds Hi8 and Hi16, respectively. Both cell types showed good adhesion and proliferation as denoted by the live/dead staining, Alamar Blue assay and DNA quantification analysis. Subcutaneous implantation in mice revealed weak inflammation and scaffold's integrity. The hierarchical indirect printed SF scaffolds can be promising candidate for meniscus TE scaffolding applications due their suitable mechanical properties, good biological performance and possibility of being applied in a patient-specific approach.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 241
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds
    Wang, Chong
    Huang, Wei
    Zhou, Yu
    He, Libing
    He, Zhi
    Chen, Ziling
    He, Xiao
    Tian, Shuo
    Liao, Jiaming
    Lu, Bingheng
    Wei, Yen
    Wang, Min
    BIOACTIVE MATERIALS, 2020, 5 (01) : 82 - 91
  • [22] Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Fabricated in Dissolvable 3D-Printed Molds for Patient-Specific Craniofacial Bone Regeneration
    de la Lastra, Angela Alarcon
    Hixon, Katherine R.
    Aryan, Lavanya
    Banks, Amanda N.
    Lin, Alexander Y.
    Hall, Andrew F.
    Sell, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2018, 9 (03)
  • [23] 3D Printing of Polyester Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Advancements and Challenges
    Salehabadi, Mojtaba
    Mirzadeh, Hamid
    ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES, 2024,
  • [24] 3D printing of piezoelectric and bioactive barium titanate-bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Polley, Christian
    Distler, Thomas
    Scheufler, Caroline
    Detsch, Rainer
    Lund, Henrik
    Springer, Armin
    Schneidereit, Dominik
    Friedrich, Oliver
    Boccaccini, Aldo R.
    Seitz, Hermann
    MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2023, 21
  • [25] Design of a novel electrospinning setup for the fabrication of biomimetic scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering applications
    Stocco, T. D.
    Rodrigues, B. V. M.
    Marciano, F. R.
    Lobo, A. O.
    MATERIALS LETTERS, 2017, 196 : 221 - 224
  • [26] Toward Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Techniques in Regenerative Medicine
    Chung, Justin J.
    Im, Heejung
    Kim, Soo Hyun
    Park, Jong Woong
    Jung, Youngmee
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 8
  • [27] Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering
    Hassanajili, Shadi
    Karami-Pour, Ali
    Oryan, Ahmad
    Talaei-Khozani, Tahereh
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 104
  • [28] Patient-specific meniscus prototype based on 3D bioprinting of human cell-laden scaffold
    Filardo, G.
    Petretta, M.
    Cavallo, C.
    Roseti, L.
    Durante, S.
    Albisinni, U.
    Grigolo, B.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02): : 101 - 106
  • [29] 3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds: a focus on vascular regeneration
    Wang, Pengju
    Sun, Yazhou
    Shi, Xiaoquan
    Shen, Huixing
    Ning, Haohao
    Liu, Haitao
    BIO-DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, 2021, 4 (02) : 344 - 378
  • [30] Digital micromirror device projection printing system for meniscus tissue engineering
    Grogan, Shawn P.
    Chung, Peter H.
    Soman, Pranav
    Chen, Peter
    Lotz, Martin K.
    Chen, Shaochen
    D'Lima, Darryl D.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2013, 9 (07) : 7218 - 7226