The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study

Structured Abstract ObjectivesTo assess whether morphology and dimension of the upper airway differ between patients characterized by various craniofacial morphology. Setting and Sample PopulationNinety young adult patients from the Postgraduate Clinic, Section of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark, with no obvious signs of respiratory diseases and no previous adeno-tonsillectomy procedures. Thirty patients were characterized as Class I (-0.5<ANB<4.5), 30 as Class II (ANB>4.5), and 30 as Class III (ANB<-0.5). Material and MethodsCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained in a supine position for all patients. Cephalometric landmarks were identified in 3D. Sagittal and transversal dimensions, cross sections, and partial and total volumes of the upper airway were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in all three planes of space. The cross-sectional minimal area of the upper airway was assessed as well. ResultsNo statistical significant relationships between dimension and morphology of upper airways and skeletal malocclusion were found. ConclusionDifferences in craniofacial morphology as identified by the sagittal jaw relationship were not correlated with variation in upper airway volumes. A clinical significant relation was detected between minimal area and total upper airway volume.