Investigating students' interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions

被引:69
作者
Huang, Chang-Qin [1 ]
Han, Zhong-Mei [2 ]
Li, Ming-Xi [3 ]
Jong, Morris Siu-yung [4 ,5 ]
Tsai, Chin-Chung [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Dept Educ Technol, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] South China Normal Univ, Sch Informat Technol Educ, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] South China Normal Univ, Sch Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Inst Res Excellence Learning Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Program Learning Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamic learning emotions; Interaction patterns; Online learning discussions; Lag sequential analysis; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; SEQUENTIAL-ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR PATTERNS; TASK DEMAND; COGNITION; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; MOTIVATION; EMOTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Convincing evidence found by educators and psychologists shows that students' interaction patterns of online discussions significantly affect their learning process, and are related to their learning sentiments. By using both quantitative content and lag sequential analysis, this study investigated students' interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments by performing seven types of learning tasks on an asynchronous discussion platform. The research participants were 38 postgraduate students. The results revealed that, compared to students performing the individual-oriented learning tasks, those performing the group-oriented ones had more diverse learning sentiments and interaction patterns, and deeper interactions with regard to learning sentiments. In addition, their learning sentiments exhibited a periodic feature during the process of online learning. Based on the results, we presented a four-phase model for describing a process of diverse interactions in online learning environments. In particular, this model characterizes the interactions with dynamic learning sentiments including generation, collision and integration, refinement, as well as stability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Seeking optimal confusion: a review on epistemic emotion management in interactive digital learning environments [J].
Arguel, Amael ;
Lockyer, Lori ;
Kennedy, Gregor ;
Lodge, Jason M. ;
Pachman, Mariya .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 27 (02) :200-210
[2]   Inside Out: Detecting Learners' Confusion to Improve Interactive Digital Learning Environments [J].
Arguel, Amael ;
Lockyer, Lori ;
Lipp, Ottmar V. ;
Lodge, Jason M. ;
Kennedy, Gregor .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (04) :526-551
[3]   Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
Jones, Kenneth D., II .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 15 (03) :170-175
[4]   Exploring students' behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: a progressive sequential analysis [J].
Cheng, Kun-Hung ;
Hou, Huei-Tse .
TECHNOLOGY PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (02) :171-188
[5]   An innovative consensus map-embedded collaborative learning system for ER diagram learning: sequential analysis of students' learning achievements [J].
Cheng, Li-Chen ;
Chu, Hui-Chun .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 27 (03) :410-425
[6]   The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning [J].
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Kim, Yanghee ;
Choi, DongHo .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 34 :10-17
[7]   Probing emotional influences on cognitive control: an ALE meta-analysis of cognition emotion interactions [J].
Cromheeke, Sofie ;
Mueller, Sven C. .
BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2014, 219 (03) :995-1008
[8]   Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
Kyle, Kristopher ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2017, 49 (03) :803-821
[9]   The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions [J].
Cukurova, Mutlu ;
Luckin, Rose ;
Millan, Eva ;
Mavrikis, Manolis .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 116 :93-109
[10]   Confusion can be beneficial for learning [J].
D'Mello, Sidney ;
Lehman, Blair ;
Pekrun, Reinhard ;
Graesser, Art .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2014, 29 :153-170