Economic assessment of Power-to-Liquid processes ? Influence of electrolysis technology and operating conditions

被引:53
作者
Herz, Gregor [1 ]
Rix, Christopher [1 ]
Jacobasch, Eric [1 ]
Mueller, Nils [1 ]
Reichelt, Erik [1 ]
Jahn, Matthias [1 ]
Michaelis, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Ceram Technol & Syst, Fraunhofer IKTS, Winterbergstr 28, D-01277 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Power-to-Liquid; Electrolysis; Economic analysis; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Solid oxide electrolysis; Proton-exchange membrane electrolysis; SOLID OXIDE ELECTROLYZER; FISCHER-TROPSCH; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CO-ELECTROLYSIS; TECHNOECONOMIC EVALUATION; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; FUEL PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116655
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Power-to-Liquid (PtL) processes are considered as a key technology for a fossil-free raw material and energy system. With multiple technical analyses being available and technical feasibility being proven by first pilot plants, pathways towards commercial market entry are of increasing interest. In this work multiple economic aspects of Power-to-Liquid plants are being investigated. First and foremost, the seamless integration of an economic analysis in the process modeling workflow will be demonstrated. This allows for an extensive investigation of the influence of operating conditions of the considered solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEL) on process economics and a subsequent optimization not only from an engineering standpoint but considering economics as well. Furthermore, the modular nature of the model allows for a comparison of SOEL to the more mature technology of low-temperature electrolysis with a focus on possible heat integration and by-product utilization. The potential of SOEL technology for high energetic efficiency and subsequently low production cost is highlighted. The conducted forecast to 2050 shows that SOEL-based Power-to-Liquid processes offer lower production cost of NPC = 0.203 ?2020/kWhch compared to production cost of NPC = 0.262 ?2020/kWhch for the PEMELbased process. Furthermore, based on the results of the economic assessment possible governmental support mechanisms are studied, showing that projected values for governmental incentives are expected to decrease CO2 mitigation cost from ?CO2 = 791 ?2020/tCO2 to ?CO2 = 419 ?2020/tCO2 for the 2050 scenario. Thus, existing measures and currently discussed measures are not sufficient to ensure economic viability. Consequently, more extensive schemes such as mandatory quotas for sustainable PtL products need to be implemented in order to facilitate the market entry.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis
    Ahmadi, Pouria
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (04) : 1795 - 1805
  • [2] A standardized methodology for the techno-economic evaluation of alternative fuels - A case study
    Albrecht, Friedemann G.
    Koenig, Daniel H.
    Baucks, Nadine
    Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe
    [J]. FUEL, 2017, 194 : 511 - 526
  • [3] Bottom-up cost evaluation of SOEC systems in the range of 10-100 MW
    Anghilante, Regis
    Colomar, David
    Brisse, Annabelle
    Marrony, Mathieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (45) : 20309 - 20322
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, Co2 European emission allowances
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, Final Report in Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
  • [6] BDEW, 2020, BDEW STROMPREISANALY
  • [7] Production of Fischer-Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units
    Becker, W. L.
    Braun, R. J.
    Penev, M.
    Melaina, M.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2012, 47 (01) : 99 - 115
  • [8] The benefits of Fischer-Tropsch waxes in synthetic petroleum jelly
    Bekker, M.
    Louw, N. R.
    Van Rensburg, V. J. Jansen
    Potgieter, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE, 2013, 35 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [9] Blum L, 2019, ECS T, V91
  • [10] Brinner A., 2018, Technologiebericht 4.1 Power-to-Gas (Wasserstoff) Innerhalb des Forschungsprojekts TF_Energiewende