Public involvement in multi-objective water level regulation development projects-evaluating the applicability of public involvement methods

被引:28
作者
Väntänen, A
Marttunen, M
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Sociol, FIN-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Finnish Environm Inst, Dept Expert Serv, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
public involvement; interactive planning; water level regulation; social impact assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public involvement is a process that involves the public in the decision making of an organization, for example a municipality or a corporation. It has developed into a widely accepted and recommended policy in environment altering projects. The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) took force in 2000 and stresses the importance of public involvement in composing river basin management plans. Therefore, the need to develop public involvement methods for different situations and circumstances is evident. This paper describes how various public involvement methods have been applied in a development project involving the most heavily regulated lake in Finland. The objective of the project was to assess the positive and negative impacts of regulation and to find possibilities for alleviating the adverse impacts on recreational use and the aquatic ecosystem. An exceptional effort was made towards public involvement, which was closely connected to planning and decision making. The applied methods were (1) steering group work, (2) survey, (3) dialogue, (4) theme interviews, (5) public meeting and (6) workshops. The information gathered using these methods was utilized in different stages of the project, e.g., in identifying the regulation impacts, comparing alternatives and compiling the recommendations for regulation development. After describing our case and the results from the applied public involvement methods, we will discuss our experiences and the feedback from the public. We will also critically evaluate our own success in coping with public involvement challenges. In addition to that, we present general recommendations for dealing with these problematic issues based on our experiences, which provide new insights for applying various public involvement methods in multi-objective decision making projects. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 304
页数:24
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ARNSTEIN SR, 1967, AM I PLANNERS J, V35, P216
[2]  
Burdge R.J., 1990, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, V10, P81, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0195-9255(90)90008-N, 10.1016/0195-9255, DOI 10.1016/0195-9255]
[3]  
Burdge RJ., 2002, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V20, P3, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154602781766799
[4]  
Campbell H., 2000, International planning studies, V5, P321, DOI 10.1080/713672862
[5]  
Chess Caron, 1999, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V33, P16
[6]  
*DEP ENV TRANSP RE, 2000, AARH CONV NEWC WORKS
[7]  
Dryzek J.S., 1997, POLITICS EARTH
[8]   An integrated model of public contact planning for conservation management [J].
Hockings, M ;
Carter, B ;
Leverington, F .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 22 (05) :643-654
[9]  
LESKINEN A, 1994, LAND USE EC, V5
[10]  
LOCKIE S, 2001, J INT ASS IMPACT ASS, V19, P277