The Origins of Deference: When Do People Prefer Lower Status?

被引:101
作者
Anderson, Cameron [1 ]
Willer, Robb [1 ]
Kilduff, Gavin J.
Brown, Courtney E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
status; hierarchy; rank; defer; motives; HIERARCHICAL LINEAR-MODELS; TO-FACE GROUPS; SYSTEM-JUSTIFICATION; IMPLICIT MOTIVES; SELF-EFFICACY; POWER; DOMINANCE; EXPECTATIONS; COMPETENCE; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0027409
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although the desire for high status is considered universal, prior research suggests individuals often opt for lower status positions. Why would anyone favor a position of apparent disadvantage? In 5 studies, we found that the broad construct of status striving can be broken up into two conceptions: one based on rank, the other on respect. While individuals might universally desire high levels of respect, we find that they vary widely in the extent to which they strive for high-status rank, with many individuals opting for middle- or low-status rank. The status rank that individuals preferred depended on their self-perceived value to the group: when they believed they provided less value, they preferred lower status rank. Mediation and moderation analyses suggest that beliefs about others' expectations were the primary driver of these effects. Individuals who believed they provided little value to their group inferred that others expected them to occupy a lower status position. Individuals in turn conformed to these perceived expectations, accepting lower status rank in such settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1088
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Adler A., 1930, PSYCHOL 1930, P395, DOI [10.1037/11017-021, DOI 10.1037/11017-021]
[2]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[3]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[4]   Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Srivastava, Sanjay ;
Beer, Jennifer S. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. ;
Chatman, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1094-1110
[5]   Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Kilduff, Gavin J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (02) :491-503
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1950, The Human Group
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1955, DYNAMICS BUREAUCRACY
[9]  
Bales R. F., 1955, FAMILY SOCIALIZATION, P517
[10]   CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION IN SMALL GROUPS [J].
Bales, Robert F. ;
Strodtbeck, Fred L. ;
Mills, Theodore M. ;
Roseborough, Mary E. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 16 (04) :461-468