Environmental impacts and risks of the national renewable energy targets - A review and a qualitative case study from Finland

被引:34
作者
Holma, A. [1 ]
Leskinen, P. [2 ]
Myllyviita, T. [1 ]
Manninen, K. [3 ]
Sokka, L. [4 ]
Sinkko, T. [5 ]
Pasanen, K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, PL 111, Joensuu 80101, Finland
[2] European Forest Inst, Joensuu, Finland
[3] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Lappeenranta, Finland
[4] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Renewable energy; Environmental impacts; Energy scenarios; Qualitative; Expert knowledge; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SCENARIOS; EMISSIONS; POWER; TECHNOLOGIES; PENETRATION; COMBUSTION; REDUCTION; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.146
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The EU is aiming to increase the utilisation of renewable energy to 20% of the total energy consumption by 2020. For Finland, the target is 38%. Renewable energy sources are assumed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when compared to fossil fuels. Yet not all environmental impacts of renewable energy use are thoroughly assessed, and there are no comprehensive assessments on the impacts and risks of renewable energy production that would take into account all possible environmental impacts. We applied qualitative expert knowledge to attain information on the impacts and risks of renewable energy in Finland. According to the expert panel, the overall impacts of renewable energy by 2020 are not significant. However, we found some hot spot areas, i.e. areas of the most concern related to particulate matter formation during regional wood combustion, climate impacts of forest energy, biodiversity impacts connected to several renewable energy sources, and eutrophication caused by utilisation of agricultural energy sources. There are currently no reliable and generally accepted methods to estimate the biodiversity impacts of renewable energy production, thus, this topic would require further studies. The climate change impacts of forest based energy sources are relatively well studied, but the results of these studies are highly variable because of different assumptions on spatial and time scale. A qualitative impact assessment framework, as described in this paper, can be used to assess the environmental impacts of renewable energy production and is a potential option to attain information on the renewable energy impacts as long as reliable and comparable quantitative datasets are not available. These kinds of qualitative assessments can also be applied to detect the areas that need further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1441
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Indonesia palm oil production without deforestation and peat conversion by 2050
    Afriyanti, Dian
    Kroeze, Carolien
    Saad, Asmadi
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 557 : 562 - 570
  • [3] Does moving towards renewable energy causes water and land inefficiency? An empirical investigation
    Al-mulali, Usama
    Solarin, Sakiru Adebola
    Sheau-Ting, Low
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 : 303 - 314
  • [4] Estimating CO2 emissions reduction from renewable energy use in Italy
    Aliprandi, F.
    Stoppato, A.
    Mirandola, A.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 96 : 220 - 232
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives
  • [6] [Anonymous], IEA BIOENERGY
  • [7] Renewable energy scenarios for costs reductions in the European Union
    Bigerna, Simona
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    Micheli, Silvia
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 96 : 80 - 90
  • [8] Comparison of the gaseous and particulate matter emissions from the combustion of agricultural and forest biomasses
    Brassard, Patrick
    Palacios, Joahnn H.
    Godbout, Stephane
    Bussieres, Denis
    Lagace, Robert
    Larouche, Jean-Pierre
    Pelletier, Frederic
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 155 : 300 - 306
  • [9] Renewable energy technology portfolio planning with scenario analysis: A case study for Taiwan
    Chen, Tser-Yieth
    Yu, Oliver S.
    Hsu, George Jyh-yih
    Hsu, Fang-Ming
    Sung, Wei-Nown
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (08) : 2900 - 2906
  • [10] Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Bird, Neil D.
    Cowie, Annette
    Jungmeier, Gerfried
    Schlamadinger, Bernhard
    Woess-Gallasch, Susanne
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 53 (08) : 434 - 447