Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Contact Finite Element Analysis of Mandibular All-on-4 Design

被引:9
作者
Hussein, Mostafa Omran [1 ]
Rabie, Mahmoud Elsayed [1 ]
机构
[1] Qassim Univ, Fac Dent, Qasim, Saudi Arabia
关键词
nonlinear FEA; All-on-4; design; 3D finite element; implant-supported prosthesis; IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS; STRESS;
D O I
10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00121
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The All-on-4 design was used successfully for restoring edentulous mandible. This design avoids anatomic cripples such as inferior alveolar nerve by tilting posterior implants. Moreover, tilting posterior implants of All-on-4 design had a mechanical preference than the conventional design. On the other hand, the anterior implants are parallel at the lateral incisor region. Several researches showed favorable results for tilting posterior implants. However, research did not study the influence of the anterior implant position or orientation on the mechanical aspects of this design. This study analyzes the influence of varying anterior implant position and orientation of the All-on-4 design using nonlinear contact 3D finite-element analysis. Three copied 3-dimensional models of the All-on-4 design were classified according to anterior implant position and orientation. The frictional contact between fixtures and bone was the contact type in this finite element analysis. Finally, von Mises stress and strain at implant and bone levels were recorded and analyzed using finite element software. Stress concentrations were detected mainly around the posterior implant at the loaded side. Values of the maximum equivalent stress and strain were around tilted implants of design III followed by design II, then design I. Changing the position or orientation of the anterior implants in All-on-4 design influences stress-strain distribution of the whole design.
引用
收藏
页码:E12 / E18
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bennett A., 2011, DENT NURSING, V7, P314
[2]   Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge Finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position [J].
Bonnet, A. S. ;
Postaire, M. ;
Lipinski, P. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (07) :806-815
[3]   The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement [J].
Cattaneo, PM ;
Dalstra, M ;
Melsen, B .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 84 (05) :428-433
[4]   Finite element analysis of the dental implant using a topology optimization method [J].
Chang, Chih-Ling ;
Chen, Chen-Sheng ;
Huang, Chang-Hung ;
Hsu, Ming-Lun .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2012, 34 (07) :999-1008
[5]  
Clelland N L, 1995, J Prosthodont, V4, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00323.x
[6]  
Clelland N L, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P541
[7]  
Fazi G, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P752
[8]   "All-on-four" concept and immediate loading for simultaneous rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla and mandible with conventional and zygomatic implants [J].
Ferreira, Edilson Jose ;
Kuabara, Marcos Rikio ;
Gulinelli, Jessica Lemos .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 48 (03) :218-220
[9]   Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature [J].
Geng, JP ;
Tan, KBC ;
Liu, GR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (06) :585-598
[10]  
Hong H.R., 2012, INT J ORAL MAXILLOF, V27, P69