Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries

被引:100
作者
Hill, Simeon L.
Watters, George M.
Punt, Andre E.
McAllister, Murdoch K.
Le Quere, Corinne
Turner, John
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey, NERC, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
[2] NOAA Fisheries, SW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Prot Res Div, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 USA
[3] Univ Washington, USA Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] CSIRO, Marine & Atmospher Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[5] Univ British Columbia, Fisheries Ctr, AERL, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[6] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian methods; ecosystem approach to fisheries; ecosystem models; fisheries management; model uncertainty; operational management procedures;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00257.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Fisheries scientists habitually consider uncertainty in parameter values, but often neglect uncertainty about model structure, an issue of increasing importance as ecosystem models are devised to support the move to an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF). This paper sets out pragmatic approaches with which to account for uncertainties in model structure and we review current ways of dealing with this issue in fisheries and other disciplines. All involve considering a set of alternative models representing different structural assumptions, but differ in how those models are used. The models can be asked to identify bounds on possible outcomes, find management actions that will perform adequately irrespective of the true model, find management actions that best achieve one or more objectives given weights assigned to each model, or formalize hypotheses for evaluation through experimentation. Data availability is likely to limit the use of approaches that involve weighting alternative models in an ecosystem setting, and the cost of experimentation is likely to limit its use. Practical implementation of an EAF should therefore be based on management approaches that acknowledge the uncertainty inherent in model predictions and are robust to it. Model results must be presented in ways that represent the risks and trade-offs associated with alternative actions and the degree of uncertainty in predictions. This presentation should not disguise the fact that, in many cases, estimates of model uncertainty may be based on subjective criteria. The problem of model uncertainty is far from unique to fisheries, and a dialogue among fisheries modellers and modellers from other scientific communities will therefore be helpful.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 336
页数:22
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Begley J, 2005, GADGET USER GUIDE
[2]  
Garcia S. M., 2003, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, DOI 10.1079/9781845934149.0000
[3]  
BOURKKE W, 2005, WEATHER FORECAST, V132, P2338
[4]  
Brandon J. R., 2006, Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, V8, P225
[5]   Model averaging to estimate rebuilding targets for overfished stocks [J].
Brodziak, J ;
Legault, CM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2005, 62 (03) :544-562
[6]   Biogeochemical fluxes through mesozooplankton [J].
Buitenhuis, E ;
Le Quéré, C ;
Aumont, O ;
Beaugrand, G ;
Bunker, A ;
Hirst, A ;
Ikeda, T ;
O'Brien, T ;
Piontkovski, S ;
Straile, D .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2006, 20 (02)
[7]  
Burnham K. P., 1998, Model Selection and Inference, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7_3
[8]  
Butterworth D. S., 1996, REPORT INT WHALING C, V46, P637
[9]   Spatial patterns in the ovigerous Callinectes sapidus spawning migration:: results from a coupled behavioral-physical model [J].
Carr, SD ;
Hench, JL ;
Luettich, RA ;
Forward, RB ;
Tankersley, RA .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2005, 294 :213-226
[10]   Living with uncertainty in fisheries: analytical methods, management priorities and the Canadian groundfishery experience [J].
Charles, AT .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1998, 37 (1-3) :37-50