Resource allocation in decision support frameworks

被引:9
|
作者
Phelps, Charles [1 ]
Madhavan, Guruprasad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Natl Acad Sci Engn & Med, Washington, DC USA
来源
COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA); Cost-benefit analysis (CBA); Budget constraints; Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); Policy development; Investment planning; Portfolio analysis; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; TASK-FORCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12962-018-0128-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundCost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis place limits on the dimensions of value that the models can incorporate. Cost-benefit analysis requires monetization of all measures of value (including life), a task sometimes deemed either difficult to accomplish or even repugnant. Cost-effectiveness analyses include health care gains in natural units (e.g., quality-adjusted life years or QALYs) rather than purely monetizing them (e.g., in dollars) and offers an efficiency perspective based on the ratio of cost per QALYs or similar health measures. These two methods use different rules for investment. Cost-benefit analysis says to invest whenever benefits exceed costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis says to invest if the intervention has a cost per QALY that meetsor is belowa designated cutoff value.MethodsMulti-criteria frameworks expand decision analyses by considering value tradeoffs from decision makers, and then producing a synthetic measure that summarizes the performance of investment options. This evaluation is done across all chosen dimensions of value, based on the weights provided by the decision makers, but this flexibility comes at a cost. To date, no approach is widely accepted to suggest how much to invest (how to determine a budget constraint) using multi-attribute models. Moreover, there is no agreed-upon method to measure willingness to pay for incremental multi-attribute value improvements. Our paper proposes a way forward.ResultsBased on existing dollar estimates of willingness to pay for QALYs, our concept creates a comparable cutoff for multi-criteria value measures. Our proposed method expands the acceptable cost per QALYs in proportion to how much of the total measure is accounted for by the QALY component. Agreed-upon values for cost per QALY are thus extrapolated to account for extra value created by non-QALY attributes of each intervention.ConclusionUsing our proposed methods, the cost per QALY cutoff can serve as a benchmark toward creating a resource allocation cutoff in multi-criteria frameworks.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A decision-support framework for evaluating public investments: integrating sustainability in urban planning and resource allocation
    Boix-Cots, David
    de la Fuente, Albert
    Pujadas, Pablo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 17 (01) : 44 - 68
  • [42] Decision support system for social occupational injury insurance institutions: cost analysis and targeted resource allocation
    Rauner, Marion S.
    Schaffhauser-Linzatti, Michaela M.
    Bauerstaetter, Johannes
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 23 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [43] A decision support system for strategic asset allocation
    Beraldi, P.
    Violi, A.
    De Simone, F.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (03) : 549 - 561
  • [44] Decision support for the optimal allocation of security controls
    Zhang, He
    Chari, Kaushal
    Agrawal, Manish
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2018, 115 : 92 - 104
  • [45] An Analytic Decision Support Tool for Resident Allocation
    Talay-Degirmenci, Isilay
    Holmes, Casey J.
    Kuo, Paul C.
    Jennings, Otis B.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 70 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [46] Investment-decision criteria and resource allocation in transition
    Fakin, B
    ECONOMICS OF PLANNING, 1997, 30 (01): : 17 - 31
  • [47] Optimizing Decision Making and Resource Allocation in Palliative Care
    Haycox, Alan
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 38 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [48] Investment-decision criteria and resource allocation in transition
    Barbara Fakin
    Economics of Planning, 1997, 30 : 17 - 31
  • [49] Fuzzy decision-making for dynamic resource allocation
    Zhang, H.
    Tam, C.M.
    Construction Management and Economics, 2003, 21 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [50] DECISION-FOCUSSED RESOURCE MODELLING FOR DESIGN DECISION SUPPORT
    Liu, Shaofeng
    Duffy, Alex
    Whitfield, Robert Ian
    Boyle, Iain
    Wang, Wenjuan
    Mohamed, Khaled
    ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 3: DESIGN ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, : 169 - +