Can Informal Environmental Regulation Promote Green Innovation? - A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Environmental Information Disclosure Policy

被引:9
作者
Peng, Youyuan [1 ]
Ji, Yaqian [1 ]
机构
[1] North Univ China, Sch Econ & Management, 3 Xueyuan Rd, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2022年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
informal environmental regulation; green innovation; EIDP; difference-in-difference model; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY; POLLUTION; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/145189
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the constraints of the ecological environment become increasingly strict, how to balance between environmental protection and economic development has emerged as a crucial issue. Based on the panel data of 281 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2017, this paper considers the information disclosure policy (EIDP) as a quasi-natural experiment and evaluates the impact of EIDP on green innovation with the gradual difference-in-difference (DID) model. Furthermore, the influence mechanism and heterogeneity characteristics are analyzed. The result shows that: 1) The EIDP implemented in 2008 significantly improves the level of green innovation among Chinese cities; 2) The mechanism of the EIDP include optimizing the innovation environment, increasing innovation input and gathering innovative talents. 3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that, the impacts of EIDP on green innovation in low-and medium-level industrialized cities are greater than high-level industrialized cities, while effects on cities with low-and medium-level of economic development are much lower than those with high-level of economic development. This paper provides new evidence to the green innovation effect of informal environmental regulation and reexamines Porter Hypothesis in order to offer new references to optimize future environmental regulation policy.
引用
收藏
页码:2795 / 2809
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disclosure strategies for pollution control
    Tietenberg, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (3-4) : 587 - 602
  • [42] Air pollution control intensity and ecological total-factor energy efficiency: The moderating effect of ownership structure
    Wang, Qian
    Yuan, Baolong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 186 : 373 - 387
  • [43] [温忠麟 Wen Zhonglin], 2014, [心理科学进展, Advances in Psychological Science], V22, P731
  • [44] Wheeler D., 2001, J ENV DEV, V10, P225, DOI DOI 10.1177/10704965-0101003-02
  • [45] Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China
    Wu, Jing
    Chang, I-Shin
    Yilihamu, Qimanguli
    Zhou, Yu
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 74 : 186 - 200
  • [46] Yang W., 2018, Bus. Manag. J., V40, P5
  • [47] Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: Based on an extended CDM model
    Yuan, Baolong
    Xiang, Qiulian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 : 895 - 908
  • [48] Zhang H., 2020, Research on Economics and Management, V41, P62
  • [49] ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY VS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS IN CHINA BASED ON DEA MALMQUIST MODEL AND PORTER HYPOTHESIS
    Zhang, X.
    Yue, L.
    Chang, Y.
    Wu, Z.
    Muhammad, A. A.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (06): : 7519 - 7534
  • [50] Analysis of the spatial effect of outward foreign direct investment on air pollution: evidence from China
    Zhou, Anhua
    Li, Jun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (37) : 50983 - 51002