New clean energy communities in polycentric settings: Four avenues for future research

被引:52
作者
Blasch, J. [1 ]
van der Grijp, N. M. [1 ]
Petrovics, D. [1 ]
Palm, J. [2 ]
Bocken, N. [2 ,3 ]
Darby, S. J. [4 ]
Barnes, J. [4 ]
Hansen, P. [4 ]
Kamin, T. [5 ]
Golob, U. [5 ]
Andor, M. [6 ]
Sommer, S. [6 ,9 ]
Nicita, A. [7 ]
Musolino, M. [7 ]
Mlinaric, M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Inst Environm Studies IVM, De Boelelaan 1111, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ IIIEE, Lund, Sweden
[3] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst MSI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst ECI, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Ljubljana, Ctr Social Psychol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[6] RWI Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Essen, Germany
[7] CNR ITAE, Adv Energy Technol Inst ITAE Nicola Giordano, Messina, Italy
[8] GEN I Doo, Krshko, Slovenia
[9] Bochum Univ Appl Sci, North Rhine Westphalia, Bochum, North Rhine Wes, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Energy communities; Socio-technical innovation; Energy transitions; Polycentric governance; Business model innovation; Social value creation; GRASS-ROOTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; BUSINESS MODEL; POWER; CLIMATE; CONSERVATION; INITIATIVES; TRANSITION; NETWORKS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102276
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Given the gaps between EU ambitions regarding energy community development and the current reality of clean energy communities in Europe, we explore a research framework enabling viable multi-and interdisciplinary research into new clean energy communities. We offer a definition of new clean energy communities, discuss their potential for wider dissemination and identify four factors that contribute to the current mismatch between ambitions and reality in energy community development. As a broader framework for interdisciplinary research into the field of new clean energy communities, we propose polycentric governance theory, considering the fact that the area of community energy systems is essentially multi-scalar, and that the rules of engagement in such systems are of great significance. This opens up four avenues for research on energy communities, which we outline in terms of enabling institutional contexts, potential for learning and transferability, business models and value propositions, and evaluation of outcomes and processes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Agarwal S., 2016, ROLE GOALS REAL TIME
[2]   Social norms and energy conservation [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (9-10) :1082-1095
[3]   Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation A Systematic Review of Non-price Interventions and Their Causal Effects [J].
Andor, Mark A. ;
Fels, Katja M. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 148 :178-210
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CHANGING ACTOR DYNAM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, COMM COMM EUR PARL C
[6]   The institutionalisation of sustainable practices in cities: how initiatives shape local selection environments [J].
Barnes, Jake ;
Durrant, Rachael ;
Kern, Florian ;
MacKerron, Gordon .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2018, 29 :68-80
[7]  
Bauwens T, 2017, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33753-1_6
[8]   What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives [J].
Bauwens, Thomas ;
Gotchev, Boris ;
Holstenkamp, Lars .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 :136-147
[9]  
Brakenhoff D, 2016, INTERRELATIONSHIP NA
[10]  
Brandon A., TESTING CROWD OUT SO, DOI [10.1073/pnas.1802874115, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1802874115]