Peer-assisted learning in medical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:79
作者
Brierley, Clarissa [1 ]
Ellis, Leila [2 ]
Reid, Emily Roisin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Torbay & South Devon NHS Fdn Trust, Torquay, England
关键词
STUDENTS-AS-TEACHERS; SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; CLINICAL SKILLS; SENIOR PEERS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE; 1ST-YEAR;
D O I
10.1111/medu.14672
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives The prevalence of peer-assisted learning (PAL) featuring alongside the core medical curriculum is increasing; however, the evidence base for PAL's efficacy on academic performance is limited. This systematic review of randomised studies of PAL in medical school sets out to assess the impact of PAL on academic outcomes in medical school and evaluate whether PAL confers a benefit in specific educational contexts. Methods A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science and Education Research Complete. Titles and abstracts were screened, and records were selected following strict eligibility criteria. Following full-text assessment for eligibility, two reviewers independently extracted data from the final selection of records and a meta-analysis was performed. Studies were classified using a modified version of Kirkpatrick's levels of learning. Student test scores were standardised by calculating the standardised mean difference (SMD). Results Twenty-seven randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion, and twenty-one provided sufficient and complete data to enable meta-analysis. There was a significant improvement in the academic performance of medical students who received PAL compared with those in the control group (SMD = 0.44 [95% confidence interval 0.10-0.78]; p = .01). The impact of PAL was greater amongst clinical medical students (SMD = 0.63; p = .02) than preclinical medical students (SMD = 0.22; p = .33) and when used for teaching practical skills (SMD = 0.59; p = .006) compared with theory (SMD = -0.11; p = .21). Students taught by PAL also achieved better results in assessments conducted more than four weeks after course completion (SMD = 1.20; p = .04). Conclusions Medical students experiencing PAL benefit in terms of academic performance, relative to those not receiving PAL. PAL is of greatest value in the clinical stages of training and for practical skills. The long-term outcomes of PAL remain a priority for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 373
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
[61]   Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education [J].
Ten Cate, Olle ;
Durning, Steven .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (06) :546-552
[62]   Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills [J].
Tolsgaard, Martin G. ;
Gustafsson, Amandus ;
Rasmussen, Maria B. ;
Hoiby, Pernilla ;
Mueller, Cathrine G. ;
Ringsted, Charlotte .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (06) :553-557
[63]  
Topping K. J., 1998, PEER ASSISTED LEARNI
[64]  
Topping K. J, 2005, Educational Psychology, V25, P631, DOI [10.1080/01443410500345172, DOI 10.1080/01443410500345172]
[65]   The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature [J].
Topping, KJ .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) :321-345
[66]  
TREVINO FM, 1980, J MED EDUC, V55, P952
[67]  
Usman Robina, 2019, J Pak Med Assoc, V69, P1588, DOI 10.5455/JPMA.286712.
[68]   Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence amongst medical students and residents? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Viljoen, Charle Andre ;
Millar, Rob Scott ;
Engel, Mark E. ;
Shelton, Mary ;
Burch, Vanessa .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11)
[69]   Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited [J].
Wadoodi, A ;
Crosby, JR .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2002, 24 (03) :241-244
[70]  
WALKERBARTNICK LA, 1984, J MED EDUC, V59, P309