The application of deep learning algorithms to classify subsurface drilling lost circulation severity in large oil field datasets

被引:21
作者
Mardanirad, Sajjad [1 ]
Wood, David A. [2 ]
Zakeri, Hassan [3 ]
机构
[1] Oil Ind Engn & Construct Grp, Tehran, Iran
[2] DWA Energy Ltd, Lincoln, England
[3] Pasargad Explorat & Prod, Tehran, Iran
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2021年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
Lost circulation; Machine learning; Deep learning of drilling datasets; Convolutional neural network; Gated recurrent unit; Long-short term memory; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION; FLUID; RISK; DAMAGE; KICK;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-021-04769-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, we present how precise deep learning algorithms can distinguish loss circulation severities in oil drilling operations. Lost circulation is one of the costliest downhole problem encountered during oil and gas well construction. Applying artificial intelligence can help drilling teams to be forewarned of pending lost circulation events and thereby mitigate their consequences. Data-driven methods are traditionally employed for fluid loss complexity quantification but are not able to achieve reliable predictions for field cases with large quantities of data. This paper attempts to investigate the performance of deep learning (DL) approach in classification the types of fluid loss from a very large field dataset. Three DL classification models are evaluated: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM). Five fluid-loss classes are considered: No Loss, Seepage, Partial, Severe, and Complete Loss. 20 wells drilled into the giant Azadegan oil field (Iran) provide 65,376 data records are used to predict the fluid loss classes. The results obtained, based on multiple statistical performance measures, identify the CNN model as achieving superior performance (98% accuracy) compared to the LSTM and GRU models (94% accuracy). Confusion matrices provide further insight to the prediction accuracies achieved. The three DL models evaluated were all able to classify different types of lost circulation events with reasonable prediction accuracy. Future work is required to evaluate the performance of the DL approach proposed with additional large datasets. The proposed method helps drilling teams deal with lost circulation events efficiently.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [21] Data integration modeling applied to drill hole planning through semi-supervised learning: A case study from the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit in the central Iran
    Fatehi, Moslem
    Asadi, Hooshang H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 128 : 147 - 160
  • [22] Predicting seismic-based risk of lost circulation using machine learning
    Geng, Zhi
    Wang, Hanqing
    Fan, Meng
    Lu, Yunhu
    Nie, Zhen
    Ding, Yunhong
    Chen, Mian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 176 : 679 - 688
  • [23] GitHub, 2017, TENSORFLOW REL 1 0 0
  • [24] Gulli A, 2019, Deep Learning With TensorFlow 2 and Keras: Regression, ConvNets, GANs, RNNs
  • [25] Heaton J, 2019, DEEP LEARNING COURSE
  • [26] Performance Comparison of Algorithms for Real-Time Rate-of-Penetration Optimization in Drilling Using Data-Driven Models
    Hegde, Chiranth
    Daigle, Hugh
    Gray, Ken E.
    [J]. SPE JOURNAL, 2018, 23 (05): : 1706 - 1722
  • [27] Use of machine learning and data analytics to increase drilling efficiency for nearby wells
    Hegde, Chiranth
    Gray, K. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 40 : 327 - 335
  • [28] Hoffimann J., 2018, Sequence Mining and Pattern Analysis in Drilling Reports with Deep Natural Language Processing, DOI DOI 10.2118/191505-MS
  • [29] HOWARD GC, 1951, T AM I MIN MET ENG, V192, P171
  • [30] Quantitative and qualitative analysis of lost circulation in natural and induced fractured formations: the integration of operational conditions and geomechanical parameters
    Jahanbakhshi, Reza
    Keshavarzi, Reza
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 19 (04) : 418 - 444