When do low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up to managers?

被引:21
作者
Starzyk, Anita [1 ]
Sonnentag, Sabine [2 ]
机构
[1] NEOMA Business Sch, Dept People & Org, Rouen Campus,1 Rue Marechal Juin,BP 215, F-76825 Mont St Aignan, France
[2] Univ Mannheim, Dept Psychol, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Upward voice; Proactive motivation; Personal initiative tendency; Transformational leadership; Psychological safety; Person-situation interactions; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR; SELF-DETERMINATION; MEDIATING ROLE; WORK; VOICE; CITIZENSHIP; CONCORDANCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103342
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research on proactive motivation has shown that employees' personal initiative tendency relates positively to the responsibility they feel for change, which then predicts upward voice. This study focuses on circumstances when low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up. We examine how the interpersonal work environment (i.e., transformational leadership and psychological safety) moderates the indirect relationship between personal initiative tendency and upward voice via felt responsibility. We collected multi-source survey data from 133 employees, their co-workers, and managers working in 41 automotive repair shops and hair salons. At the first stage of the indirect effect, managers' transformational leadership substituted for employees' personal initiative tendency in predicting the responsibility employees felt for change. At the second stage, psychological safety operated as a catalyst: Employees' feelings of responsibility and upward voice were not related in low psychologically safe workgroups, but were positively related in high psychologically safe workgroups. To help low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up at work, organizations and managers need to promote both the value of change and safety in taking interpersonal risks.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MULTILEVEL ANAL INTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
[3]   Core Self-Evaluations and Employee Voice Behavior: Test of a Dual-Motivational Pathway [J].
Aryee, Samuel ;
Walumbwa, Fred O. ;
Mondejar, Reuben ;
Chu, Chris W. L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (03) :946-966
[4]   Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance [J].
Baer, M ;
Frese, M .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (01) :45-68
[5]   A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Edwards, Jeffrey R. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (01) :45-87
[6]   Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research [J].
Baruch, Yehuda ;
Holtom, Brooks C. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2008, 61 (08) :1139-1160
[7]   When Voice Matters: A Multilevel Review of the Impact of Voice in Organizations [J].
Bashshur, Michael R. ;
Oc, Burak .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 (05) :1530-1554
[8]  
Bass B. M., 1985, LEADERSHIP PERFORMAN
[9]   THE PROACTIVE COMPONENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR - A MEASURE AND CORRELATES [J].
BATEMAN, TS ;
CRANT, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :103-118
[10]  
Becker M., 2012, KFZ SERVICEMECHANIKE