Estimation of China's production efficiency of natural gas hydrates in the South China Sea

被引:53
作者
Kong, Zhaoyang [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Qingzhe [3 ]
Dong, Xiucheng [3 ]
Wang, Jiang [4 ]
Wan, Xin [4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Natural gas hydrates; EROI; Production efficiency; Net energy; China; ENERGY-RETURN; NET ENERGY; INVESTMENT EROI; UNITED-STATES; BEARING SEDIMENTS; FOSSIL-FUELS; SHENHU AREA; OIL; EXTRACTION; SHALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.262
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural gas hydrates are expected to be one of the most important unconventional energy resources in the future, China is accelerating its research and trial exploitation of hydrates in the South China Sea, which is where most of China's gas hydrate reservoirs are located. Because it represents a prospective alternative energy source, it is necessary to use the energy return on investment method to evaluate production efficiency. The results show that the average standard energy return on investment is 0.74, the energy return on investment within the boundary from wellhead to processing is 0.58. and the energy return on investment within the boundary from well to utilization is 0.56. The negative net energy suggests that natural gas hydrate is not presently a favourable choice to replace conventional energy sources; thus, the large-scale development of natural gas hydrate requires further technological development. Sensitivity analysis shows that to acquire a strong positive energy return on investment, technological developments must be accompanied by simultaneous increases in ultimate gas recovery and the gas-to-water ratio. Moreover, the choice of proper production methods has an important influence on energy return on investment and should be based on the knowledge of physical properties gained through sufficient geological surveys. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Study of effective parameters for enhancement of methane gas production from natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J].
Aghajari, Hamid ;
Moghaddam, Moien Habibi ;
Zallaghi, Mehdi .
GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 4 (04) :453-469
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1971, ENV POWER SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BIOPHYSICAL EC RESOU
[6]   Analysis of energy security, environmental emission and fuel import costs under energy import reduction targets: A case of Pakistan [J].
Anwar, Javed .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 :1065-1078
[7]   A Preliminary Energy Return on Investment Analysis of Natural Gas from the Marcellus Shale [J].
Aucott, Michael L. ;
Melillo, Jacqueline M. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (05) :668-679
[8]  
Bai J. H., 2015, OIL GAS FILED DEV, V33, P79
[9]   Modelling EROEI and net energy in the exploitation of non renewable resources [J].
Bardi, Ugo ;
Lavacchi, Alessandro ;
Yaxley, Leigh .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 223 (01) :54-58
[10]   Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for the Electrical Heating of Methane Hydrate Reservoirs [J].
Callarotti, Roberto Cesare .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (11) :2105-2114