Usability evaluation of a library website with different end user groups

被引:19
作者
Kous, Katja [1 ]
Pusnik, Maja [1 ]
Hericko, Marjan [1 ]
Polancic, Gregor [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Inst Informat, Fac Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Maribor, Slovenia
[2] Univ Maribor, Comp Sci & Informat, Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
Different groups of end users; effectiveness; efficiency; measurement framework; satisfaction; usability testing; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; WEB SITE; AGE; UNIVERSITY; CRITERIA; IMPACT; FIND;
D O I
10.1177/0961000618773133
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
To ensure a certain degree of usability, a library website should be carefully designed, especially since end users constitute a multitude of people with different needs and demands. The focal objective of this research was to investigate how different types of end users (i.e. pupils, students, the working population, seniors and researchers) respond to a library website in terms of its effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction, which together represent its usability. The answers were obtained by performing formal usability testing, including think-aloud protocol, log analysis and questionnaires. The results of the statistical analysis show that different groups of end users achieve different levels of effectiveness and efficiency, while there is no significant difference between groups in satisfaction level. The results also indicate that participants did not achieve the threshold for a usable website. Based on the identified weaknesses, researchers present recommendations for improving a website's usefulness, especially for non-experienced users. This research has two main contributions: (1) the connection between the theoretical definition and practical use of ISO 9241-11 attributes and (2) a usability testing procedure with a measurement framework applicable for different types of users in a specific domain, which could be applied to other domains.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 90
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards [J].
Abran, A ;
Khelifi, A ;
Suryn, W ;
Seffah, A .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2003, 11 (04) :325-338
[2]   A user-centred design and evaluation of IR interfaces [J].
Ahmed, S. M. Zabed ;
McKnight, Cliff ;
Oppenheim, Charles .
JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2006, 38 (03) :157-172
[3]  
Albert W., 2010, Beyond the Usability Lab
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Measuring the User Experience
[5]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHNOLOGY J
[6]   Discovering how students search a library Web site: A usability case study [J].
Augustine, S ;
Greene, C .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2002, 63 (04) :354-365
[7]   Usability testing of an academic library Web site: A case study [J].
Battleson, B ;
Booth, A ;
Weintrop, J .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2001, 27 (03) :188-198
[8]  
Brinck T., 2002, DESIGNING WEB SITES
[9]   Word-processing training and retraining: Effects of adult age, experience, and interface [J].
Charness, N ;
Kelley, CL ;
Bosman, EA ;
Mottram, M .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2001, 16 (01) :110-127
[10]   Usability and impact of digital libraries: a review [J].
Chowdhury, Sudatta ;
Landoni, Monica ;
Gibb, Forbes .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2006, 30 (06) :656-680