Fourier analysis of several finite difference schemes for the one-dimensional unsteady convection-diffusion equation

被引:16
作者
Pereira, JMC [1 ]
Pereira, JCF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Super Tecn, LASEF, Dept Mech Engn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
one-dimensional unsteady; convection-diffusion; Fourier analysis; stability limits;
D O I
10.1002/fld.136
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper reports a comparative study on the stability limits of nine finite difference schemes to discretize the one-dimensional unsteady convection-diffusion equation. The tested schemes are: (i) fourth-order compact; (ii) fifth-order upwind; (iii) fourth-order central differences; (iv) third-order upwind; (v) second-order central differences; and (vi) first-order upwind. These schemes were used together with Runge-Kutta temporal discretizations up to order six. The remaining schemes are the (vii) Adams-Bashforth central differences, (viii) the Quickest and (ix) the Leapfrog central differences. In addition, the dispersive and dissipative characteristics of the schemes were compared with the exact solution for the pure advection equation, or simple first or second derivatives, and numerical experiments confirm the Fourier analysis. The results show that fourth-order Runge-Kutta, together with central schemes, show good conditional stability limits and good dispersive and dissipative spectral resolution. Overall the fourth-order compact is the recommended scheme. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 439
页数:23
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
Roache P.J., 1976, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID
[22]   ARTIFICIAL VISCOSITY [J].
ROACHE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1972, 10 (02) :169-+
[23]  
Thomas J.W., 1995, NUMERICAL PARTIAL DI
[24]  
Vichnevetsky R., 1982, FOURIER ANAL NUMERIC
[25]   MODIFIED EQUATION APPROACH TO STABILITY AND ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHODS [J].
WARMING, RF ;
HYETT, BJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1974, 14 (02) :159-179