The Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

被引:1132
作者
Gifford, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, Victoria, BC V8S 2H1, Canada
关键词
climate change; barriers; obstacles; global warming; sustainability; HABITUAL CAR USE; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; PAST BEHAVIOR; EVERYDAY LIFE; SOCIAL NORMS; RISK; OPTIMISM; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1037/a0023566
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Most people think climate change and sustainability are important problems, but too few global citizens engaged in high-greenhouse-gas-emitting behavior are engaged in enough mitigating behavior to stem the increasing flow of greenhouse gases and other environmental problems. Why is that? Structural barriers such as a climate-averse infrastructure are part of the answer, but psychological barriers also impede behavioral choices that would facilitate mitigation, adaptation, and environmental sustainability. Although many individuals are engaged in some ameliorative action, most could do more, but they are hindered by seven categories of psychological barriers, or "dragons of inaction": limited cognition about the problem, ideological worldviews that tend to preclude pro-environmental attitudes and behavior, comparisons with key other people, sunk costs and behavioral momentum, discredence toward experts and authorities, perceived risks of change, and positive but inadequate behavior change. Structural barriers must be removed wherever possible, but this is unlikely to be sufficient. Psychologists must work with other scientists, technical experts, and policymakers to help citizens overcome these psychological barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 302
页数:13
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda ;
Vlek, Charles ;
Rothengatter, Talib .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (04) :265-276
[2]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCH GLOB CLIM CHAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], UPON FURTHER REFLECT
[6]  
[Anonymous], GEOENG GIV US TIM AC
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION, VOICE, AND DECISION FRAMING ON THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC-GOODS [J].
AQUINO, K ;
STEISEL, V ;
KAY, A .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1992, 36 (04) :665-687
[8]  
Arkes HR, 2000, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V13, P295, DOI 10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3<295::AID-BDM353>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-6
[10]   Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Ajzen, I ;
Schmidt, P .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (03) :175-187